Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 02:14:23 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, Francisco Reyes <fran@reyes.somos.net>, FreeBSd Chat list <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why can't upgrades be simpler? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000629021220.04f8ae40@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20000628215142.C451@dialin-client.earthlink.net> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000628112835.00de8710@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20000627131107.0449d500@localhost> <200006270352.XAA29208@sanson.reyes.somos.net> <200006270352.XAA29208@sanson.reyes.somos.net> <20000626232045.A17065@orion.ac.hmc.edu> <4.3.2.7.2.20000627131107.0449d500@localhost> <20000628095257.A44982@mithrandr.moria.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20000628112835.00de8710@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:51 PM 6/28/2000, Crist J. Clark wrote: >You are one of the proponents of keeping STABLE as "stable" as >possible. We all have heard several times that you never start using a >new release until x.2. Now, you want the active development done on >this stable branch? It seems that you want to have your cake and eat >it too (to use a cliche that never made much sense to me). There should be more active POLISHING on the stable branch before each divergence. From .0 to about .2. (Heck, if this were done, it might well be that .1 was really solid enough for production work.) --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20000629021220.04f8ae40>