Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:59:39 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Suggestion: USES=autoplist Message-ID: <20171122165939.GC2442@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <1f4579f2-7e1c-09b0-e00b-00965ebd1338@freebsd.org> References: <1f4579f2-7e1c-09b0-e00b-00965ebd1338@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:04:22PM -0800, Yuri wrote: > While trying to update math/vtk, I found that its plist is very complex,= =20 > with many optional files, some files depending on multiple port options. >=20 > But it is a well-behaved project, and it only installs the correct file= =20 > set. It is much easier to just trust it. >=20 >=20 > So I am suggesting USES=3Dautoplist: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13181 >=20 >=20 > Any thoughts? Looking to the future, is the port an obviously candidate for FLAVORS or multi-packages? If so, they you probably want to keep the current plist. If not, then I guess it depends on your confidence that the port will remain well behaved. -- Brooks --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJaFaz6AAoJEKzQXbSebgfAmWkH/01EFaeQXBN73Xdw2wPpbgsW SKV0ymZ8cOxCIkohjabwHEzxzzaxCCyA4HsY55lKzuu7jJHb+mecT5QAJK+vP/w4 4IXxuKuoF5sSml1oovx7vN0lwh3wrzNrezCA//+hvkuFkHeZ57aVqu/Kluos0Jdr nMOo/gMwJGczgBWJDe2IkpukoRya68+bgJ9OlEf5skf5z1kaESSkFav5IYzgO1Yp sK9u9JN7LIUPwTWqRUyLeuKrYFqIXrhuSXFEf87cFRTuYjb/ynEAsTEqEf8ty+mt rXWExZ0VRTm3IjKzlsDyg8/9AyyjG5DN9qGA3N8RTUrlu381EIJci6HHz6mqGB4= =aygN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171122165939.GC2442>