From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Feb 6 17:40:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4E3CD33A8 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@krion.cc) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1123B1CB4 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@krion.cc) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r141so123519348wmg.1 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:40:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krion-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eX/6M5Zv3Qsm7SbPIRjLEcdFUWx9WtLT6Mdd6YC8RHQ=; b=hbXkS3jp0l5Gs2Nsm0Q97Ku0/Xh+oGfJXtfD23cla3gJLFRX9abNvJtPf2aDMvr51z jQ9vR+/woXuHb5nltT7pMhwyLdESLGMlw8nb/OUthmS3TEwa+N9gRVsKfLvEc3oFhEBq jYvogA0b//FvzHddJAQgBYdmFQZWUAoGASKutAqbwhXyu+Ypt0NQMMe3/K70wGWQIvHV BbhZ14mgPxMkjUFJPeZ0JMBlU2pVeX3u7C1RVkbmR23qcaVHE0sET/bMkM7AxbRUtxsu jHygMiCJ0+C6AyedNjJinrmHNO7LTe2O5iuX1JPUunr97Dm9Ehyq1hzQfPiPR5A10z1N Lo1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eX/6M5Zv3Qsm7SbPIRjLEcdFUWx9WtLT6Mdd6YC8RHQ=; b=XHIn4iZq9d6zb9gnYmJ1ffTW5uv+21WWqwVZmFLvTEuxybm4XBZ9rkOBbTimk/V8Tz r4gUnL5eH8iHVjpMLkdkXBdeHIKx3NloQMeaEypioGARGi6Gwo75vFKhaeC1vAaMFvBG 0KdPc0TwNLcUepGStUOWbyfIABTU7Dr7VjsSfT5SQoDZgCchhTPDR9ve+6+fdaMcdk9i 47Yg9aiJhfU+cTGUJH99gpCPEHZXmNByDZz5SP91deHfTv/x+/NpTwwPAgM9eeocCLZk c3JlXjrl4ezxj3dnIFUnbJ1WclnJLZNE9WG8YVNkKwZ9vr9MCxbpYTXJ2Wb88qL5br5h s64Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nKxigwOi19TOzoT+/glvEUYu+o867YQL4BUWTyAQ9t3BDK2X7wYc7H4Lw+dYcK9g== X-Received: by 10.28.58.204 with SMTP id h195mr9381726wma.116.1486402850318; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:40:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from vein (static.37.53.251.148.clients.your-server.de. [148.251.53.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y97sm14132845wmh.24.2017.02.06.09.40.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:40:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:40:06 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarev To: Rainer Hurling Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd ports , Don Zavitz Subject: Re: devel/libcheck Message-ID: <20170206174006.GA78642@vein> References: <3df61113-0150-d487-a32b-7041d5ebd99f@zavitz.ca> <20170206062916.GE13006@home.opsec.eu> <49464a20-dfd7-302e-4890-5e4dd6f5cf15@gwdg.de> <73899cc6-419d-0641-d507-fc53e9030a9f@gwdg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <73899cc6-419d-0641-d507-fc53e9030a9f@gwdg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:40:53 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/06, Rainer Hurling wrote: > > Perhaps, this is something for UPDATING? > >=20 > > No, UPDATING is for things humans need to do. portmaster should be able > > to figure this out from MOVED (which is mostly meant for machines). >=20 > Of course, I know this about UPDATING. >=20 > In this case with devel/check, the automatism with portmaster does not > work as expected, at least for Don and me. >=20 > Shouldn't portmaster, after a successful build of devel/check, first > deinstall libcheck and than install check? >=20 > For some reason, this seems not to work as expected. When portmaster > tries to install devel/check, it conflicts with a present > /usr/local/bin/checkmk, because libcheck was not uninstalled before. >=20 > I have no clue about the underlying reasons. It should definitely be in UPDATING, with portmaster example if portmaster can't handle it by its update (and it seems it can't handle it with 'portmaster -a') K. --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEJCHRFhEAQujKni1pDyI9/LMCykUFAliYtPQACgkQDyI9/LMC ykXIqgf6A6Z0wwah1LrudvmlBBU4iEkIiLH0+hUSWeBd+qWDgXo6ZjAnV2bAvNVL 85S7xUegFbae16svU9CrAqzUzDTazwPv8DivemeSNKaqDI1xNRqqdadgmD7e50kA KJfKWg/3LOIlgA1KHtSj2NlULzeR86/v5oTYg2SEF/EBJH30SsecNo8G3YrGO25m Nldw49qLWXmHQp7q6/tewLMHFCVkKooBU6eB/MFV0ElptjRMFdG2ovlq36El1mvZ 2AuSmdcF1tHAXPP/utePa6FUQlaVaIRNt4z6CcOhMIgMIKBgHr6krNGYRLJiZEBO 6gBAn8v6RJhcA+uJUsyqbjpPocH3Sw== =7UKy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--