Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:38:43 -0500
From:      Charles Owens <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>
To:        Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: em(4): 4-port Intel Pro/1000 PF card not detected
Message-ID:  <4CE1B673.6010306@greatbaysoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinFExkm1DKH3ESokePEP7b8nyNpAK3WP2K6Ao%2Bo@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4CDDBAC6.6080500@greatbaysoftware.com>	<AANLkTinft6Ts4zK46wPdj4YWsRYE_uEwgDMQfWsHtDA1@mail.gmail.com>	<4CE1913D.7010207@greatbaysoftware.com>	<AANLkTikjsJ%2BuFyf-aMJDURz5no8rL_CsgEZG2PbRcfY0@mail.gmail.com>	<4CE1A9F1.8050400@greatbaysoftware.com> <AANLkTinFExkm1DKH3ESokePEP7b8nyNpAK3WP2K6Ao%2Bo@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I believe we have an answer:

http://www.intel.com/support/network/adapter/pro100/sb/CS-030873.htm

The motherboard definitely is PCIe 2.0 .   The page suggests these cards 
for use with a PCIe2.0 system:

# Intel® PRO/1000 PT Quad Port LP Server Adapter (P/N EXPI9404PTL)
# Intel® Gigabit ET Quad Port Server Adapter (P/N E1G44ET)
# Intel® Gigabit ET2 Quad Port Server Adapter (P/N E1G44ET2)


Notably there's not a PF option shown, so we're going to have to think 
about that.   But in any case, do you think these models will function 
with 8.0?  8.0 plus a patch?  .... or is 8.1 the only option?

Thanks,
Charles


On 11/15/10 4:58 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Well, if the system doesnt show the hardware in a PCI scan there isn't 
> much my driver can do :)
>
> The last line in your log says 'eth0', what's that about?
>
> You could try booting 8.1 64 bit, you can also send me all the details 
> about the board, just to
> make sure I can get the exact one and then I'll try it here. This is 
> quad port fiber, right? I was
> thinking this was PCI ID 0x1527, 82580 adapter.  The support is in 
> HEAD now.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Charles Owens 
> <cowens@greatbaysoftware.com <mailto:cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>> wrote:
>
>     Jack, I'm afraid that with the card _not_ installed we get
>     identical pciconf output.  We're running 32 bit simply because
>     that's where we got rolling with our product, and have not yet
>     made the call to invest in the effort required to make the jump to
>     64.  Do you think that our being at 32 bit could be a factor here?
>
>     So far the same card model has been tested on several of these
>     server appliances, so I doubt it's a bad-slot situation.
>
>     In case it's helpful, I've attached  a boot log.  Anything else
>     that I can provide that might help?
>
>     Thank you,
>     Charles
>
>
>
>     On 11/15/10 3:23 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>         UH, did you do that with the adapter in the system?? I do not
>         see the ID I
>         expected
>         to see. Some reason you're running 32 bit??
>
>         Can you run the pciconf with the adapter in and out, compare
>         and tell me
>         what its
>         ID is?  All the unidentified devices I see are in the 0x3XXX
>         range and those
>         are not
>         network devices.
>
>         Maybe its a bad slot?
>
>         Jack
>
>
>         On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Charles
>         Owens<cowens@greatbaysoftware.com
>         <mailto:cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>
>
>             wrote:
>              Great... thanks!   Please see attached.   BTW, the system
>             is running
>             8.0-RELEASE-p2 i386 (PAE).
>
>
>             Charles
>
>
>
>             On 11/13/10 2:24 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>             pciconf -l please, I'll betcha these are the new quad
>             ports that are in my
>             next igb driver
>             update, it would have gone in already but I've been
>             fighting a bug in the
>             header split
>             code.
>
>             Show me what the output looks like, and I'll get ya fixed
>             up, dont worry :)
>
>             Jack
>
>
>             On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Charles Owens<
>             cowens@greatbaysoftware.com
>             <mailto:cowens@greatbaysoftware.com>>  wrote:
>
>                 Hello,
>
>                 We're trying to work with newly purcharsed Intel
>                 EXPi9404PF NICs ("Intel
>                 PRO/1000 PF Quad Port Server Adapter") but they do not
>                 seem to be detected
>                 (no ports showing with 'ifconfig -l').   We're having
>                 no problems with the
>                 2-port version of the same card -- is there a known
>                 issue with the 4-port
>                 version?
>
>                 We've tried three different cards of this model, all
>                 with same result.
>                  Thanks in advance for any help.
>
>                 Charles
>
>                 --
>                  Charles Owens
>                  Great Bay Software, Inc.
>
>
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 freebsd-net@freebsd.org
>                 <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org> mailing list
>                 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>                 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>                 "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org
>                 <mailto:freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         freebsd-net@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
>         mailing list
>         http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>         To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>         "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org
>         <mailto:freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CE1B673.6010306>