From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 20:33:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF25A16A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:33:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from april.chuckr.org (april.chuckr.org [66.92.151.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4CF43D3F for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:33:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from april.chuckr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by april.chuckr.org (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAOKxsJe022221; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:59:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost)iAOKxqfk022218; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:59:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) X-Authentication-Warning: april.chuckr.org: chuckr owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:59:52 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey To: "Ernst W. Winter" In-Reply-To: <20041124200653.GB2754@lobo.homeunix.org> Message-ID: <20041124155620.B4002@april.chuckr.org> References: <20041124145143.O4002@april.chuckr.org> <20041124194744.GA2102@lobo.homeunix.org> <20041124200653.GB2754@lobo.homeunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acroread on the amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:33:42 -0000 On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Ernst W. Winter wrote: > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Chuck Robey wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Ernst W. Winter wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Chuck Robey wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone have more detailed info about that? Notice, I didn't mail > > > > to freeBSD-ports, I don't know how strict our mailing list filters > > > > are, I thought they'd probably kick me out if I tried to > > > > cross-post. > > > > > > > well I would suggest that you should try "xpdf" or "gpdf" and "gv" as > > > that would cover that part well, I never have used the Acrobat reader > > > as these other always done whatever I needed them for and I have > > > compiled them now with a AMD64 here and they behave well. I would > > > say, try it. > > > > Trying to get apsfilter working, and it wants acroread, so I'm going to > > *try* that first. In my own experience, although it's rare, there ARE > > those docs that get read by acroread, and not by xpdf, I've seen them. > > > well I never used that option and with xpdf there where a time when > there where some hickups, but so far no more, also as I said there is > gpdf and it works well and I have seen others with kde that do the > job well, so far I have collected some Gigabyte of documents as I do > research for people and neve had any problems and do I can't comment > on Acroread either. Well, you did say (above) that you didn't try acroread, so I guess you probably didn't even realize that one of the files that you might have given up on, "garbage", actually might have printed with acroread. Not common .... maybe not worth the work, I dunno, the damn install from Adobe is very , very unfriendly, I will have to hack the heck out of it to get it to work, not sure I want to invest all that skullsweat. I do know how to do that, but I don't think it's worth too much time. > > Ernst > > -- > Ernst Winter ewinter@ewinter.org "Nec scire fas est onmnia" --Horaz > Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? > Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? > BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD, chuckr@chuckr.org | electronics, communications, and SF/Fantasy. New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up fictitious words in the dictionary (on the wall at my old fraternity, Signa Phi Nothing). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------