From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 08:21:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176F598EF06; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA361F85; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:21:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pdcu2 with SMTP id u2so99014732pdc.3; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 01:21:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bazAskVUeIhhxcnj42kI/SHOTE7YASC4ayy4c8Xnq+U=; b=L44T7xvde7i1NKVrS3A/VkolPTWj+0lOOrEvnaAIcpwMMJnbpn57+T2K8z3a5nbwcU Y73C8WfaZo0IQfYyRgM0Wv3YL0YV3URqvoIEcwLlGAlgBAeTbVniM4e64t9c7nE83BdV 8SmDR2ayoaQA+EO8yJDfib5j/lkd4e/MbEMCokpTuNz0PvxoTu/Vp46MiFa+nBbtBsS5 qwlwSZuLuoPUyiSwr9r5QghuB9jhNOU6U7ID37GIAIW/y8vmuDXN2P0xsUbIVAbqH6oR iprerWDlCOx/4ReC7eCPqfUQF85Rp/gF1oZ5eKRQV85GaLdcJPU+RgwiXvyWYw5AC8Vg E7uw== X-Received: by 10.66.164.161 with SMTP id yr1mr19970051pab.63.1435479660451; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 01:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0002.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wm8sm35258275pbc.19.2015.06.28.01.20.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Jun 2015 01:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: python_CMD in shebangfix.mk References: <20150628013453.3b38e871@bsd64.grem.de> To: Michael Gmelin , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , python@FreeBSD.org, Marcus von Appen From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <558FAE66.4050101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:20:54 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150628013453.3b38e871@bsd64.grem.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:21:01 -0000 On 28/06/2015 9:34 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > This has been discussed before on freebsd-python: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python/2014-May/006964.html > > I just found myself writing > > python_OLD_CMD= /usr/bin/env python > python_CMD= ${PYTHON_CMD} > > as python_CMD is /usr/local/bin/python by default, which seems to be > against > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy > > which says > > "Executable scripts being installed MUST use ${PYTHON_CMD as shebang > line. See: Mk/Uses/shebangfix.mk" > > So > > python_CMD?= ${PYTHON_CMD} would seem a reasonable default. > > Also, adding "/usr/bin/env " as an alternative > _OLD_CMD would be useful. > > - Michael > This seems reasonable, I recall thinking a similar thinge thing last week. CC'ing python@ and mva@ who created that entry From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 09:46:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABB898DE30 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ECC12FE for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 940E598DE2D; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9396098DE2C for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8513E12FD for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5S9k39b029629 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t5S9k3TU029628; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201506280946.t5S9k3TU029628@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:46:03 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ japanese/texinfo | 4.7 | 6.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 10:19:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8936998C534 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 10:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jensen.leslie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53CC41AB3 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 10:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jensen.leslie@gmail.com) Received: by igrv9 with SMTP id v9so24685057igr.1 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Kk2e3UzMtStDKaH2Fju8+qBoKePvY9nCDrRL340gJg8=; b=m6sU0/K4vg2Syi4Gxr56v2AILITjTzfsgPHYS6a6cvi/g3r4mqSFjbIWznJZss1Eyo dlbz0LRBY63sY5z4ozDh7/cjAyA2E37Cek7aeiFwPebcewlTAKziM6mf9oInRRWkFTDu tooCGE7c/g+uy1t1H34xj2VUmUXj6qgMbEJ1PGx7czXiBtjHH+EuhS9PVjHLQqZ2Hjtg Ryc0jp5+FhoeW6jqFkIB8uRcPr0N1EiWrI6W4kIlYBOF3Z4A7zDsC/vKOIgKcjQ3+Ozx ZTksThJGAN7OW7a7zGLMuuQbmk/RbNd7ENBabJTOqhGEHG7M0tcxfe6IZNwkOPQWuiFT Zt3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.43.199 with SMTP id y7mr12582493ice.12.1435486755643; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.36.133 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 03:19:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <558F7E71.1040407@consciuminternational.com.au> References: <558E543C.9050006@consciuminternational.com.au> <558F7E71.1040407@consciuminternational.com.au> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:19:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Cups-base will not build From: Leslie Jensen To: Dewayne Geraghty , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 10:19:16 -0000 2015-06-28 6:56 GMT+02:00 Dewayne Geraghty < dewayne.geraghty@consciuminternational.com.au>: > Hi Leslie, I'm very confident that cups-base will not build without one > of the zeroconf options defined. > > I chose the mdnsresponder because it used less libraries and works. I > did try avahi but I recall it being difficult. > > Try enabling MDNSRESONDER and advise if that worked to the ports list. :) > > Good luck, Dewayne. > Thank you Dewayne. That did it! :-) /Leslie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jun 28 23:02:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5679C98FED3 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3B21B19 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 396DD98FED1; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743898FECE; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (unknown [IPv6:2620:64:0:1:223:7dff:fea2:c8f2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36B61B0C; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3360B2AA354; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:01:49 -0600 (MDT) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 060761CC16; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:02:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:02:02 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: Don Lewis Cc: db@db.net, ports@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, kwm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: all those c++ ABI variations in ports Message-ID: <20150628230202.GA56527@night.db.net> References: <20150427124935.GA89535@night.db.net> <201504271956.t3RJuaWd008600@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201504271956.t3RJuaWd008600@gw.catspoiler.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 23:02:13 -0000 The problem is now known. It's a lack of quad math support in our libcompiler_rt. gfortran requires quad math support which our clang compiler does not support yet, since Fortran itself needs quad math by the standard. Normally this is never a problem if rpath is used and the local/lib libgcc is used, but it does become a problem if a core program is used which loads a module compiled with gfortran. The module loaded expects quad math and will fail against our version of libgcc. Actually it will fail in rtld.c code complaining that our version of libgcc is not compatible with the version the gfortran code was compiled against. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:56:36PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > On 27 Apr, Diane Bruce wrote: > > A problem I have not seen noted here are ports that load run time modules. > > > > gnuradio is a case in point. The dependancies are all built (by default) > > with stock clang++ & system libs but some of the runtime code it loads > > for operation has modules compiled with gfortran. > > That should be a valid combination. Fortran is part of ports gcc, but > code compiled with it doesn't link to libstdc++, so there should not be > a conflict with code compiled with clang++ and linked to libc++. I > haven't run into any issues with octave built with openblas, which is > the combo that you describe. > > % ldd /usr/local/bin/octave > /usr/local/bin/octave: > libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x800823000) > libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x800b5c000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x800d6e000) > libc++.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 (0x800f96000) > libcxxrt.so.1 => /lib/libcxxrt.so.1 (0x801255000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x801471000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801687000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8018ab000) > libxcb.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x801c57000) > librpcsvc.so.5 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5 (0x801e76000) > libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x80207f000) > libpthread-stubs.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0 (0x802281000) > libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x802482000) > > > % ldd /usr/local/lib/octave/3.8.2/liboctave.so > /usr/local/lib/octave/3.8.2/liboctave.so: > libcurl.so.4 => /usr/local/lib/libcurl.so.4 (0x802341000) > libumfpack.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libumfpack.so.1 (0x8025aa000) > libsuitesparseconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libsuitesparseconfig.so.1 (0x802858000) > libcholmod.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libcholmod.so.1 (0x802a59000) > libamd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libamd.so.1 (0x802d43000) > libcamd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libcamd.so.1 (0x802f4a000) > libcolamd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libcolamd.so.1 (0x803152000) > libccolamd.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libccolamd.so.1 (0x803359000) > libcxsparse.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libcxsparse.so.1 (0x803564000) > libarpack.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libarpack.so.1 (0x80378f000) > libqrupdate.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libqrupdate.so.1 (0x803a27000) > libfftw3_threads.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libfftw3_threads.so.3 (0x803c3d000) > libfftw3.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libfftw3.so.3 (0x803e43000) > libfftw3f_threads.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libfftw3f_threads.so.3 (0x8041a8000) > libfftw3f.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libfftw3f.so.3 (0x8043ae000) > libopenblasp.so => /usr/local/lib/libopenblasp.so (0x804800000) > libreadline.so.8 => /lib/libreadline.so.8 (0x806576000) > libncurses.so.8 => /lib/libncurses.so.8 (0x8067b9000) > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x806a06000) > libgfortran.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgfortran.so.3 (0x806c79000) > libquadmath.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libquadmath.so.0 (0x806f90000) > libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x8071cb000) > libc++.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc++.so.1 (0x8073dd000) > libcxxrt.so.1 => /lib/libcxxrt.so.1 (0x80769c000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8078b8000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x807ae0000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800821000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x807d04000) > libssl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.7 (0x807f1a000) > libheimntlm.so.11 => /usr/lib/libheimntlm.so.11 (0x808186000) > libhx509.so.11 => /usr/lib/libhx509.so.11 (0x80838c000) > libcom_err.so.5 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.5 (0x8085d6000) > libcrypto.so.7 => /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x8087d8000) > libasn1.so.11 => /usr/lib/libasn1.so.11 (0x808bce000) > libwind.so.11 => /usr/lib/libwind.so.11 (0x808e6b000) > libheimbase.so.11 => /usr/lib/libheimbase.so.11 (0x809093000) > libroken.so.11 => /usr/lib/libroken.so.11 (0x809297000) > libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x8094a9000) > libz.so.6 => /lib/libz.so.6 (0x8096c9000) > libkrb5.so.11 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.11 (0x8098df000) > libgssapi.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.10 (0x809b57000) > libgssapi_krb5.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.10 (0x809d60000) > libheimipcc.so.11 => /usr/lib/private/libheimipcc.so.11 (0x809f7e000) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 02:20:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B5798CB5B for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E0418BB; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp14-2-7-211.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.7.211]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2015 11:43:37 +0930 Message-ID: <5590A9CE.80208@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:43:34 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Anderson CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_GITHUB and submodules References: <555B84AA.30901@FreeBSD.org> <555BD95A.6010706@ShaneWare.Biz> <555C8C68.9060705@gmail.com> <555DD44E.5040405@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <555DD44E.5040405@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:20:22 -0000 >> Jonathan Anderson >> May 20, 2015 at 11:00 AM >> Thanks everybody for the input! With a security hat on, I definitely concur >> with the policy of no fetching outside of fetch and of requiring >> reproducibility/verifiability (e.g., commit hashes). With my >> getting-this-darn-port-updated hat, however... :) >> >> I think that I'll try to go with Shane's solution, if others concur that it's >> a good idea. I don't want to create a rust-llvm port, since Rust's customized >> version of LLVM isn't much good outside of Rust, it doesn't expose any >> external libraries and it's intended to eventually go away. So, until GitHub >> implements the "give me a tarball with all of the submodules" feature, I might >> try hacking up MASTER_SITES as Shane suggests. >> In case you missed it this was changed shortly after the last email, see http://leader/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/FreeBSD-ports?view=revision&revision=387742 If you follow the link in the comments to review.freebsd.org you can find some examples of ports updated to this change. One catch that may either change or become documented is that one item must be in the DEFAULT group, which can be implied by not giving it a group name. Using this also gives you multiple WRKSRC_* definitions eg using the group name addons will let you use ${WRKSRC_addons} in custom steps. This leads to USE_GITHUB= yes GH_ACCOUNT= sambler \ sambler:addons \ sambler:contrib \ sambler:trans GH_PROJECT= myblender \ myblenderaddons:addons \ myblendercontrib:contrib \ myblendertranslations:trans GH_TAGNAME= sambler-${PORTVERSION}.${PORTREVISION} \ addons-${PORTVERSION}.${PORTREVISION}:addons \ contrib-${PORTVERSION}.${PORTREVISION}:contrib \ translate-${PORTVERSION}.${PORTREVISION}:trans and further down - post-extract: @${MV} ${WRKSRC_trans}/* ${WRKSRC}/release/datafiles/locale/ @${MV} ${WRKSRC_addons}/* ${WRKSRC}/release/scripts/addons/ @${MV} ${WRKSRC_contrib}/* ${WRKSRC}/release/scripts/contrib/ -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 09:22:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7816398C9B3 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578322041 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 564D998C9B0; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C7498C9AF for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22c.google.com (mail-wg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EA52040 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:22:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by wguu7 with SMTP id u7so135810190wgu.3 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:22:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=aVMy+gfrz+jcvaDa0gHdaWF/Z6Evkie9a9GvsnzIk+Q=; b=Y4qdKmCMTTwp7fnZXmeBFy63tKoQSfuV1WmYfbvBTsjGMS6lZyS+NeZvM+m5HpQZFs Scdy9KzBbkq/KUq3LSQHofgf95AhUW408KNDS2WocVj0D2Sn8UpzGH9PqODUxVb0V2bc cwd1DwBtTB5hi2kX24a9CL25Qxq2eH3psGPh44vsBFy5q+KJNSpHGGMXm5bKlJgE2gfw OyH9c//tj6tHGHEBi+8/g0MjWAd+3aoUcWALju5gu0pQ/n81bvhwNUT1YPlnwVJqJbwJ 28PGkgdCDe3vGhPjjZNdKRr8GhcD1xqRVWIJjFOU1fiPMH2gjVyo8RpbxHTE3N4kkeMB GLrA== X-Received: by 10.180.72.177 with SMTP id e17mr473003wiv.12.1435569750282; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id be3sm11180390wib.21.2015.06.29.02.22.28 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:22:27 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [HEADSUP] portmaster/portupgrade support for new features Message-ID: <20150629092226.GL68142@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:22:33 -0000 --Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline hi all, A couple of new features are coming to the ports tree. The first of which has landed in the ports tree and should not be used before a while, still before we start using it, it would be a very good idea to bring support for it to portmaster/portupgrade. (I have already done the change in poudriere and it will be in te next version.) So since recently we can remove the ${PORTSDIR} from all the dependency lines. (Please do not use that syntax before all the tools are able to handle it!) Aka BLA_DEPENDS= pattern:${PORTSDIR}/category/port can now become pattern:category/ports I haven't checked portmaster/portupgrade code so I have no idea if they will support that out of box or if they will need some changes. I would really appreciate to see people testing that and provide patches if necessary so that the day we adopt this syntax those tools are already ready to use it ootb. FYI: https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster and https://github.com/freebsd/portupgrade Later more changes will be necessary to support upcoming VARIANTS (formerly known as FLAVOURS) and sub packages. This first step would allow you to step into the code of those tools before the having to deal with more intrusive changes :) Best regards, Bapt --Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlWRDlIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExdmACgwMa/HMJrxY9MZuSji/7bp+GL 2+wAn00OOvMEJR+wlYs6XgGpSFDOdXgw =OK+n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ms5iOKSBOB9YS8zC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 13:46:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997FF98FB81 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arthur.ruprecht@arthur-ruprecht.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E73415E4 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arthur.ruprecht@arthur-ruprecht.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7D7E598FB80; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6329D98FB7F for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arthur.ruprecht@arthur-ruprecht.de) Received: from vwp11768.webpack.hosteurope.de (vwp11768.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:5bfa:4684::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F4215E3 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arthur.ruprecht@arthur-ruprecht.de) Received: from wp11180888 by vwp11768.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with local id 1Z9ZOE-0004gX-43; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:46:26 +0200 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Problem with parcel shipping, ID:00000315432 X-PHP-Script: schuh-merkel.de/post.php for 84.200.12.141, 84.200.12.141 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:46:26 +0200 From: "FedEx International Next Flight" Reply-To: "FedEx International Next Flight" Message-ID: <107c9b83b77acb163112c14ed8bb4f6f@vwp11768.webpack.hosteurope.de> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; arthur.ruprecht@arthur-ruprecht.de; 1435585590; e560010b; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:46:30 -0000 Dear Customer, We could not deliver your item. Please, open email attachment to print shipment label. Thanks and best regards, Jacob Crosby, Operation Agent. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 14:44:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4696898F841 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0621E2134; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1539ABDC69; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:44:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E18BDBDC64; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:44:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82406122; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECD78FCBF3; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:44:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:44:16 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Shane Ambler , Jonathan Anderson cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_GITHUB and submodules Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5590A9CE.80208@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <555B84AA.30901@FreeBSD.org> <555BD95A.6010706@ShaneWare.Biz> <555C8C68.9060705@gmail.com> <555DD44E.5040405@FreeBSD.org> <5590A9CE.80208@ShaneWare.Biz> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========225E8AA307342173FB90==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:44:24 -0000 --==========225E8AA307342173FB90========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +--On 29 juin 2015 11:43:34 +0930 Shane Ambler wrote: |>> Jonathan Anderson |>> May 20, 2015 at 11:00 AM |>> Thanks everybody for the input! With a security hat on, I definitely |>> concur with the policy of no fetching outside of fetch and of requiring |>> reproducibility/verifiability (e.g., commit hashes). With my |>> getting-this-darn-port-updated hat, however... :) |>> |>> I think that I'll try to go with Shane's solution, if others concur |>> that it's a good idea. I don't want to create a rust-llvm port, since |>> Rust's customized version of LLVM isn't much good outside of Rust, it |>> doesn't expose any external libraries and it's intended to eventually |>> go away. So, until GitHub implements the "give me a tarball with all of |>> the submodules" feature, I might try hacking up MASTER_SITES as Shane |>> suggests. |>> | | In case you missed it this was changed shortly after the last email, see | http://leader/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/FreeBSD-ports?view=revision&revision=3877 | 42 It's going to be in the porter's handbook, waiting for approval on . -- Mathieu Arnold --==========225E8AA307342173FB90========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVkVnBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85Iq1UP+gOPSc+5pojVuGXz4KmBr7yX eivouY3Gf74mbDnhJPQMgBJcvEqTt4ZNfqdYLtSPe+ZsVsvMLsBDNNXAgd7i9JnQ 0fdkGys4A7/rJwA6GlM0rc5qr+FzQ1DCFt4x2xXUjOagHl3sxr6StAVoJBtvNja1 a3aEj5J4xGHnjhuTfNJCz0cP9pBWCRJwqTvzAAU0RcOJUkaRtlPmAlYNH3kKwsF7 hTMRXFmfswXeSsACi/GCcm5cy5e3NU77vKrGjx/cY4a6WgwkJyVoxLAYRyrwIX99 0WQawcC4o7S4kFiQ4K4VnkX0lGAHodqQpqxSN/1YeuIxfxRmjWDfOZllXxhh7tYn TktuC4+rWJsb8MP/Z2tcPs5V/YROvF1n5NF6szgy1JPF+HkWu7nHvMwr1DVdaIyL etyrFaxP0czGZTmyEyQQ2U+wvf/X8IkrRxOmQ+JGO1AP0P+cy2zWykYOUCv5M4Yz dueUUWrlHoQoW8AXW5SurO96zGmppvRtzG7BEeyoR2bBnKgGGSsvJIVJQbB74kii brSxQfcclYZqDT3LmelkQHmvtSKja/94jKygfhMo2VNxiPBTcPTDYt0tfD3/juMH Ucm14QJqibZmtKjFy2IzgsLo8c1K4EWxZ2GqqjwE+GkxctRRYTuy8GuXBhyfoEUb aBQTj897+Yp2AD6VFkdN =LAdY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========225E8AA307342173FB90==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 23:39:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5CA990F08 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from mail.as41113.net (mail.as41113.net [91.208.177.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6011A9B; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from [172.21.88.127] (unknown [91.208.177.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@m.jwh.me.uk) by mail.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mL4zP6vMrz1N2HN; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:39:29 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: ftp/curl needs better config error message please To: "Julian H. Stacey" , sunpoet@freebsd.org References: <201506292330.t5TNU9CP002678@fire.js.berklix.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Carmel NY From: Joe Holden Message-ID: <5591D731.1060700@m.jwh.me.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:39:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201506292330.t5TNU9CP002678@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:39:41 -0000 On 30/06/2015 00:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Joe Holden wrote: >> On 27/06/2015 00:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >>>> Hi sunpoet@ cc ports@ >>>> cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm2;make package-recursive >>>> ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. >>> ftp/curl is still broken after >>> svn up # Updated to revision 390661. >>> >>> Many ports depend on ftp/curl, >>> I've temporarily added to DUDS: >>> fvwm2 mrxvt arandr lxrandr xorg xorg-apps chromium dillo2 >>> & so far I've only got (backward) from ports/x* to ports/www/ >>> >>> I tried >>> locate ibre | grep -i ssl | grep usr/ports | grep -v /work/ >>> cd /usr/ports/security/libressl ; make install >>> libressl-2.2.0 conflicts with installed package(s): openssl-1.0.2_3 >>> >>> pkg info -a | grep -i ssl >>> cd /usr/ports/security/openssl # just an inspired guess. >>> make deinstall >>> cd /usr/ports/ftp/curl >>> make package-recursive # OK. >>> >>> Now httrack complains: >>> Shared object "libcrypto.so.8" not found, required by "libhttrack.so.2" >>> >>> pkg check -d -a | grep ssl >>> httrack has a missing dependency: openssl >>> nettle has a missing dependency: openssl >>> >>> cd /usr/ports/security/openssl >>> make package-recursive >>> >>> httrack now works, but Ive now killed curl, >>> cd x11-wm/fvwm2 ; make >>> ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> This SSL can of worms with opaque error messages is not sufficient. >>> Which explicit exact variable names collide or needed for Which ? >>> explicit exact full file names please ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Julian >> Not sure if I am missing something here - just set GSSAPI_NONE for the >> port and it just works (tm) > Thanks Joe, > Perhaps its me missing something > or having something too much, but what ? > > What should I set where, how ? Please someone be explicit ! > su > source `which /home/jhs/bin/.csh/unsetenv.csh` > printenv > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin > TERM=xterm > mv /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.MV > rm -rf /var/db/ports/*curl ; ls -l /var/db/ports/*curl > cd /usr/ports/ftp/curl > make clean > ===> Cleaning for pkg-1.5.4 > ===> Cleaning for openssl-1.0.2_3 > ===> Cleaning for perl5-5.20.2_4 > ===> Cleaning for ca_root_nss-3.19.1_1 > ===> Cleaning for curl-7.43.0_2 > make > curl-7.43.0_2 GSSAPI_BASE is not compatible with > OpenSSL from ports. Use other GSSAPI options or > OpenSSL from base system. > *** Error code 1 > setenv GSSAPI_NONE TRUE ; make # Fails > ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is > not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. > Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. > *** Error code 1 > unsetenv GSSAPI_NONE > make GSSAPI_NONE=TRUE # Fails > make GSSAPI_NONE=YES # Fails > make GSSAPI_NONE= # Fails > vi -c/GSSAPI_ Makefile > Lost for choice what to explore ! > Where Is This Port Broken Please ? > ports/ftp/curl still does not work here with ports at revision 390877 > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com > Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context. > Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars. > Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64. When I encountered this in my poudriere build, I added the following: curl_SET+=GSSAPI_NONE curl_UNSET+=GSSAPI_BASE Obviously it also depends on if you use openssl from ports or base, granted it is really obscure but the message at least did give me some idea what it expected: root@jump:~ # pkg info curl | grep GSSAPI GSSAPI_BASE : off GSSAPI_HEIMDAL : off GSSAPI_MIT : off GSSAPI_NONE : on Although I have no use for GSSAPI so YMMV I guess... I use openssl from ports so that might be a factor, I haven't checked since. Cheers, Joe From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jun 29 23:41:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB0698F00F for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from mail.as41113.net (mail.as41113.net [91.208.177.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118B01D45; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@m.jwh.me.uk) Received: from [172.21.88.127] (unknown [91.208.177.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@m.jwh.me.uk) by mail.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mL51v0Zzyz1N2HN; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:41:39 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: ftp/curl needs better config error message please To: "Julian H. Stacey" , sunpoet@freebsd.org References: <201506292330.t5TNU9CP002678@fire.js.berklix.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Carmel NY From: Joe Holden Message-ID: <5591D7B2.9040704@m.jwh.me.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:41:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201506292330.t5TNU9CP002678@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 23:41:41 -0000 On 30/06/2015 00:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Joe Holden wrote: >> On 27/06/2015 00:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >>>> Hi sunpoet@ cc ports@ >>>> cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm2;make package-recursive >>>> ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. >>> ftp/curl is still broken after >>> svn up # Updated to revision 390661. >>> >>> Many ports depend on ftp/curl, >>> I've temporarily added to DUDS: >>> fvwm2 mrxvt arandr lxrandr xorg xorg-apps chromium dillo2 >>> & so far I've only got (backward) from ports/x* to ports/www/ >>> >>> I tried >>> locate ibre | grep -i ssl | grep usr/ports | grep -v /work/ >>> cd /usr/ports/security/libressl ; make install >>> libressl-2.2.0 conflicts with installed package(s): openssl-1.0.2_3 >>> >>> pkg info -a | grep -i ssl >>> cd /usr/ports/security/openssl # just an inspired guess. >>> make deinstall >>> cd /usr/ports/ftp/curl >>> make package-recursive # OK. >>> >>> Now httrack complains: >>> Shared object "libcrypto.so.8" not found, required by "libhttrack.so.2" >>> >>> pkg check -d -a | grep ssl >>> httrack has a missing dependency: openssl >>> nettle has a missing dependency: openssl >>> >>> cd /usr/ports/security/openssl >>> make package-recursive >>> >>> httrack now works, but Ive now killed curl, >>> cd x11-wm/fvwm2 ; make >>> ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> This SSL can of worms with opaque error messages is not sufficient. >>> Which explicit exact variable names collide or needed for Which ? >>> explicit exact full file names please ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Julian >> Not sure if I am missing something here - just set GSSAPI_NONE for the >> port and it just works (tm) > Thanks Joe, > Perhaps its me missing something > or having something too much, but what ? > > What should I set where, how ? Please someone be explicit ! > su > source `which /home/jhs/bin/.csh/unsetenv.csh` > printenv > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin > TERM=xterm > mv /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.MV > rm -rf /var/db/ports/*curl ; ls -l /var/db/ports/*curl > cd /usr/ports/ftp/curl > make clean > ===> Cleaning for pkg-1.5.4 > ===> Cleaning for openssl-1.0.2_3 > ===> Cleaning for perl5-5.20.2_4 > ===> Cleaning for ca_root_nss-3.19.1_1 > ===> Cleaning for curl-7.43.0_2 > make > curl-7.43.0_2 GSSAPI_BASE is not compatible with > OpenSSL from ports. Use other GSSAPI options or > OpenSSL from base system. > *** Error code 1 > setenv GSSAPI_NONE TRUE ; make # Fails > ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is > not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. > Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. > *** Error code 1 > unsetenv GSSAPI_NONE > make GSSAPI_NONE=TRUE # Fails > make GSSAPI_NONE=YES # Fails > make GSSAPI_NONE= # Fails > vi -c/GSSAPI_ Makefile > Lost for choice what to explore ! > Where Is This Port Broken Please ? > ports/ftp/curl still does not work here with ports at revision 390877 > > Cheers, > Julian > -- > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com > Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context. > Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars. > Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64. Setting GSSAPI_HEIMDAL or GSSAPI_MIT looks like it will do the right thing, although it will obviously drag yet another dependency in... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 00:40:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5A298FC10 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AD84195F; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B227642.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.118.66]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5TNXxXY036676; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:33:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t5TNUYmJ062610; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:30:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t5TNU9CP002678; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:30:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201506292330.t5TNU9CP002678@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Joe Holden , sunpoet@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Carmel NY Subject: Re: ftp/curl needs better config error message please From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 27 Jun 2015 01:34:57 +0100." <558DEFB1.6060906@m.jwh.me.uk> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 01:30:09 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:40:42 -0000 Joe Holden wrote: > On 27/06/2015 00:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> Hi sunpoet@ cc ports@ > >> cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/fvwm2;make package-recursive > >> ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. > > ftp/curl is still broken after > > svn up # Updated to revision 390661. > > > > Many ports depend on ftp/curl, > > I've temporarily added to DUDS: > > fvwm2 mrxvt arandr lxrandr xorg xorg-apps chromium dillo2 > > & so far I've only got (backward) from ports/x* to ports/www/ > > > > I tried > > locate ibre | grep -i ssl | grep usr/ports | grep -v /work/ > > cd /usr/ports/security/libressl ; make install > > libressl-2.2.0 conflicts with installed package(s): openssl-1.0.2_3 > > > > pkg info -a | grep -i ssl > > cd /usr/ports/security/openssl # just an inspired guess. > > make deinstall > > cd /usr/ports/ftp/curl > > make package-recursive # OK. > > > > Now httrack complains: > > Shared object "libcrypto.so.8" not found, required by "libhttrack.so.2" > > > > pkg check -d -a | grep ssl > > httrack has a missing dependency: openssl > > nettle has a missing dependency: openssl > > > > cd /usr/ports/security/openssl > > make package-recursive > > > > httrack now works, but Ive now killed curl, > > cd x11-wm/fvwm2 ; make > > ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > This SSL can of worms with opaque error messages is not sufficient. > > Which explicit exact variable names collide or needed for Which ? > > explicit exact full file names please ? > > > > Cheers > > Julian > Not sure if I am missing something here - just set GSSAPI_NONE for the > port and it just works (tm) Thanks Joe, Perhaps its me missing something or having something too much, but what ? What should I set where, how ? Please someone be explicit ! su source `which /home/jhs/bin/.csh/unsetenv.csh` printenv PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin TERM=xterm mv /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.MV rm -rf /var/db/ports/*curl ; ls -l /var/db/ports/*curl cd /usr/ports/ftp/curl make clean ===> Cleaning for pkg-1.5.4 ===> Cleaning for openssl-1.0.2_3 ===> Cleaning for perl5-5.20.2_4 ===> Cleaning for ca_root_nss-3.19.1_1 ===> Cleaning for curl-7.43.0_2 make curl-7.43.0_2 GSSAPI_BASE is not compatible with OpenSSL from ports. Use other GSSAPI options or OpenSSL from base system. *** Error code 1 setenv GSSAPI_NONE TRUE ; make # Fails ===> curl-7.43.0_1 GSSAPI_BASE is set, which is not compatible with OpenSSL/LibreSSL from ports. Set GSSAPI_NONE or do not use ports SSL.. *** Error code 1 unsetenv GSSAPI_NONE make GSSAPI_NONE=TRUE # Fails make GSSAPI_NONE=YES # Fails make GSSAPI_NONE= # Fails vi -c/GSSAPI_ Makefile Lost for choice what to explore ! Where Is This Port Broken Please ? ports/ftp/curl still does not work here with ports at revision 390877 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context. Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 09:38:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C3898C9EF for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E2D1C4C for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8207998C9EB; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8191098C9EA for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F901C4B for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5U9cRg0086516 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t5U9cRvU086515; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201506300938.t5U9cRvU086515@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:38:27 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ print/lilypond-devel | 2.19.11 | 2.19.22 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 15:21:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A31D98FDBC for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A68123F for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E080C98FDB4; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF6898FDB3 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD450123D; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by igblr2 with SMTP id lr2so14771214igb.0; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NfT9NFLp+dBrJ7FIUxft/JgXPnVIroKSvKd7ailq3ok=; b=KtIVFa79WPLy9tgzylEEAf+X2YzBVJWG5+Ur1DaIPToKwBEYUKZIk8KVI/RB7qIq25 Wg0/GEFUVLnWxQmKkPE0Nu1PgDjuUAvlbpNh7TWv9bGunfxFsMmznwBLkT26yORaKRPR I+7KtOwpiu9P0cko95FPPbRdb6EMZyVBO/pmnfzO3Y9/nY7FJzlVcZAgJDD13Iduhvrz JDBhLHWqle5dMPPZgFOu8/VILxBqnfKe9HJgDRSlLVe77NJtloNd+64L9yrzQmu5Rp3v Ss7yw+e/9VfpDI7YePJYRNfeJQFee9/Py2cWuUiSJQUx83ND/zx20oDQgGzXcGPXWTxk 9Idw== X-Received: by 10.50.66.174 with SMTP id g14mr25280375igt.7.1435677691981; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm7935253igl.17.2015.06.30.08.21.29 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5592B406.1020408@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:21:42 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) To: bf@freebsd.org CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: links port Makefile logic error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:21:33 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 16:48:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B5B9902C1 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486941F1B for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:48:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: by ykfy125 with SMTP id y125so14371893ykf.1 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:48:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DYOqZbA6CH71fQolBsk15POO5uDxoY1CfF2GiVNuyQk=; b=bus78XPU68geNrfGCVHRDnKSyxQi/qyxLeQWc+bE+si0nnGecGhH98KywtAZi7TWcB vPpRUOb/da18KjQfi/FjaFXm2r3QzUw/tBV9Xyfjd4hLC0U3IMYEvMvER3SCwFPO/Prp qjkwSGnC7eVX+D2pFFwC3dWdXNmxopORjoefStLmFmKmQlAUZbbQDiJZ+Xoj5JZ37Jlc CYldVlIkE9vv4jTZ9SRtWgHPfHHdjqebNFL0dlb8jufZrz2/4X7nLPiFIxMlFrytWqtE hlTNlnsnquI33aDhdmupZlQXMFrtLfLFT2H9I7e0XmgX6PCNLo8WbfqShF8aKWqRLpRs uX+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.35.6 with SMTP id j6mr25224864ywj.37.1435682899290; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.203.211 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:48:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: www/squid: tcp_outgoing_address binds to wrong interface From: Nick Rogers To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:48:20 -0000 Hello, I am experiencing an issue with squid 3.5.5 and FreeBSD 10.1 where tcp_outgoing_address correctly rewrites the source address of outgoing packets, but fails to bind the socket to the correct interface. I've been using this kind of setup/configuration for quite some time (since the squid 2.7 days), so I believe something between FreeBSD 9.x and 10.1 has broken this behavior. FWIW squid 3.3.3 on FreeBSD 9.x behaves correctly with the same config. My understanding is that squid merely changes the source address as a hint to the kernel routing stack, which makes me believe the problem lies outside of squid. I've already sought out help from the squid-users mailing list and been told the same thing. I've been able to replicate this on a non-production VM with a simple config. For example, I have two WAN interfaces: WAN1 (em0/192.168.92.246) and WAN2 (em1/10.8.8.10), and a LAN interface (em2/192.168.5.1/24). My default route points to the gateway for WAN1/em0. I have configured a tcp_outgoing_address for a single host on the LAN (192.168.5.2) to use outgoing address 10.8.8.10 (WAN2/em1). HTTP request packets from squid end up going out em0 (the default route interface) with an ip of 10.8.8.10. The source IP is correct but the packets egress the wrong interface, so they are obviously dropped by the upstream router on that incorrect interface. This is evident by tcpdump on em0. The following is my test squid.conf and some basic network config. While I normally use squid as a transparent proxy in conjunction with PF+ALTQ for NAT/firewall and routing enabled, for the purposes of replicating the issue in my VM test environment I have disabled PF, routing, and connected directly to squid via my browser's proxy config. Attempts to load webpages time out unless I remove use of the tcp_outgoing_address directive. # begin test squid.conf acl SSL_ports port 443 acl Safe_ports port 80 # http acl Safe_ports port 21 # ftp acl Safe_ports port 443 # https acl Safe_ports port 70 # gopher acl Safe_ports port 210 # wais acl Safe_ports port 1025-65535 # unregistered ports acl Safe_ports port 280 # http-mgmt acl Safe_ports port 488 # gss-http acl Safe_ports port 591 # filemaker acl Safe_ports port 777 # multiling http acl CONNECT method CONNECT http_access allow localhost manager http_access deny manager http_access deny !Safe_ports http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports http_access allow all acl wan2 src 192.168.5.2 tcp_outgoing_address 10.8.8.10 wan2 follow_x_forwarded_for allow localhost acl_uses_indirect_client on log_uses_indirect_client on http_port 3129 cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA maximum_object_size 768 MB cache_dir aufs /squid/cache 2048 32 512 access_log daemon:/squid/logs/access.log squid cache_log /squid/logs/cache.log cache_store_log none logfile_rotate 0 pid_filename /var/run/squid.pid # end test squid.conf em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:0c:29:a3:33:93 inet 192.168.92.246 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.92.255 nd6 options=9 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active em1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:0c:29:a3:33:7f inet 10.8.8.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 inet 10.8.8.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 inet 10.8.8.12 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 inet 10.8.8.13 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 inet 10.8.8.14 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 nd6 options=9 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active root# netstat -rn | grep default default 192.168.92.2 UGS em0 I am hoping someone can shed some light on this issue. Thank you. -Nick From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 18:54:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DD6990573 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01862DA9 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::4163:1d3:49c2:4bcb] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:4163:1d3:49c2:4bcb]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 439C91DB1D; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: www/squid: tcp_outgoing_address binds to wrong interface Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_367B1294-335C-4B3F-A785-73FEBB30969E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5 From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 20:54:41 +0200 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Message-Id: <10633AE6-097E-4F08-AEA0-8E78632F2BCD@FreeBSD.org> References: To: Nick Rogers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:54:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_367B1294-335C-4B3F-A785-73FEBB30969E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:48, Nick Rogers wrote: ... > I am experiencing an issue with squid 3.5.5 and FreeBSD 10.1 where > tcp_outgoing_address correctly rewrites the source address of outgoing > packets, but fails to bind the socket to the correct interface. How do you arrive at this conclusion? In the rest of your mail I see no squid configuration for this, e.g. you would have to use: http_port 10.8.8.10:3129 to explicitly bind to the first address on em1. You can add multiple http_port settings to bind to multiple addresses. > I've been > using this kind of setup/configuration for quite some time (since the squid > 2.7 days), so I believe something between FreeBSD 9.x and 10.1 has broken > this behavior. FWIW squid 3.3.3 on FreeBSD 9.x behaves correctly with the > same config. My understanding is that squid merely changes the source > address as a hint to the kernel routing stack, which makes me believe the > problem lies outside of squid. I've already sought out help from the > squid-users mailing list and been told the same thing. ... > root# netstat -rn | grep default > > default 192.168.92.2 UGS em0 Do you have a route for 10.8.8.10 and similar? Those should point to em1, obviously. If there is no specific route, those packets will simply go to the default gateway. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_367B1294-335C-4B3F-A785-73FEBB30969E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.27 iEYEARECAAYFAlWS5fkACgkQsF6jCi4glqNbAwCg8a5DeVdpwcM/N2WWlEag9VBi 3yQAn15DrmW0cafYUvxFPeZeqrel+2vs =CMXe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_367B1294-335C-4B3F-A785-73FEBB30969E-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 21:19:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DAD991DDC for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:19:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org) Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B2B10CB for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org) Received: by qgeg89 with SMTP id g89so10326747qge.3 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:organization :content-type:mime-version; bh=2WUc1pMR4CSb/lbC72ZEQ4Z9ShPNllKxQLQvksAQzM8=; b=Y4AZ3QKNKZazMQ5J3uKAWcnMMg4NnwjZioxkZq1mdLeP437Z7KW261/dArU8ARBjcK w4/P5+LirNWIFKpqGDusxqsTdvdCem9hZwgBO5PSF6XW8RsST7KL6SOhJqDRrjCLSFM6 069M5bGQlZ4JLub1fah0vI38BdMW1vmDWdQqwQgagDWbi+gsiKXNuu+sLSr6F3HB/rjg RBzXwxFOEAZhb5HI9kRhAViJNzwDQqW4d6DKnQOne2auI78fUY2M/YV9LPKgBVYverFs QAsHfqFD1i4SiIy7GXQVU+8lPj4sQ3CGFHHe2m2zElZigHM6yhJNs2yQ+K6FdXZvfo9m Db3g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnybHcnC+JU3GbMbqla914yW+ERCsrb5PQmnHqWrn8AJh5Do+4CMBYNhD0z/4Nggftf2P6z X-Received: by 10.55.31.223 with SMTP id n92mr46617216qkh.77.1435699164566; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.195] (c-73-173-98-149.hsd1.md.comcast.net. [73.173.98.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f90sm588662qgf.2.2015.06.30.14.19.22 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1435699163.8257.29.camel@hardenedbsd.org> Subject: Cannot Compile Firefox as a PIE From: Shawn Webb To: gecko@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 17:19:23 -0400 Organization: HardenedBSD Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-b2lMrai2GczysSvtHcNC" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:19:32 -0000 --=-b2lMrai2GczysSvtHcNC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT (well, technically, HardenedBSD). I'm trying to compile firefox as a Position-Independent Executable. No matter the approach I take, I get an error. I've filed a bug upstream with Firefox (link below). Is there something else I should be doing? Link to bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1178979 `uname -a`: FreeBSD laptop-dev-01 11.0-CURRENT-HBSD FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT-HBSD #12 30bd880(hardened/current/master): Tue Jun 23 11:28:31 EDT 2015 shawn@laptop-dev-01:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LATT-SEC amd64 Thanks, --=20 Shawn Webb HardenedBSD GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE --=-b2lMrai2GczysSvtHcNC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJVkwfbAAoJEGqEZY9SRW7u9l0P/irYo+zcyILL3+gLCJEYXNoB 2ycLLTsV84S6uv/XdBtPYaGisNDFVqTS/4C1ZqpitkUgGem76Y5vUpD1Q1Y9Ig8V vi9WFBDB/6QKUccE0ia+9adsC1TtwuboPQIXXhVdE+iqT2yN6jYb+FhM+x+JH8ae dwXSTd8oK7a4tWHOLpNJgdWPlGUREDgC5MNSQjWP4kHa6yjUDf2zv3l1sbQLBB+Y IQNjTVWrvi6Ge3nBWp9XFLAo9xK/2iOb1qi4pmxB4EbbqRFb9ta7h1BAnXe+A7Be CB5MXyd9wEC0MeDpZrsriWXpvjiINbKaV4kY9UNTvDM94bSGicJnxRF6Vp5DapvK SFMTJ8k4rb1jQEeGGUcOOBD35fCNWZGJzfP0eDHJkSzPxHW6BrE2Vuv+Y1xV3l2u aRJ9nXWw9oZfwE8OJHPn9qN1wgL9rwJMH49BhWerhDzTaNoO6yX4enxqwNNVcw3L eR+KMRGr7ufAmKKAr+dqBMlsUip3z77q9dNeq5BqDhxQ7WwqCY8iIJBCznbczXP1 vVXrGVg4SEVimgZhAWg+VRXUCpxj4B0eJdSQU9lKE4d4QM8AdSgfrejgMy89to+x ukqzcjRoLywSwf2hEKadJz/WIcuo9KNsqbNpkqfN5HSvOPg3zdTXDvpSN1N3ELII 35tFzprB/GHbKgMXl9hO =9ivf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-b2lMrai2GczysSvtHcNC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 21:36:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FE599116A for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E00B1D52; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: by ykdr198 with SMTP id r198so21767672ykd.3; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:36:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hIObVYh2Va2QkKcO3qgdn9Y9cpW1qskj8Z6+1XVdI1s=; b=XRKEYVeeGM+sK/sezIOHPS2rFjbXkkXQu1S/IGPpwzCbJA+ElIF6W0qaawGtsReYzc QEFWhT+jIgivrMMsKnz4tHm9HxASKBxBKP3ZYAsLi3qtmnQZNJX15jn8n0q09NCGQ8ie Fl7JSeRGjr9QeEeVmbnIhXAoHCF07gvM6Ez/evL7rsBKD0FYFWDSI/9pkmr7dUTAu3c8 4Tn73l/PmURHlHzARJUwjUbS2h7PPrCPJCvc87uB6RwONneYOfveXe68h7sjK/jzN4Al Z8uh07jXd6gWZrkgkv3pUmBbkFbumVSGuVlXzdX3bJgV9skMqOW/GXK4hniUhu01Yzmn 6KZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.49.214 with SMTP id x205mr17463294ywx.47.1435700167937; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.203.211 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <10633AE6-097E-4F08-AEA0-8E78632F2BCD@FreeBSD.org> References: <10633AE6-097E-4F08-AEA0-8E78632F2BCD@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:36:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/squid: tcp_outgoing_address binds to wrong interface From: Nick Rogers To: Dimitry Andric Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:36:09 -0000 On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:48, Nick Rogers wrote: > ... > > I am experiencing an issue with squid 3.5.5 and FreeBSD 10.1 where > > tcp_outgoing_address correctly rewrites the source address of outgoing > > packets, but fails to bind the socket to the correct interface. > > How do you arrive at this conclusion? In the rest of your mail I see no > squid configuration for this, e.g. you would have to use: > > http_port 10.8.8.10:3129 > > to explicitly bind to the first address on em1. You can add multiple > http_port settings to bind to multiple addresses. > The http_port directive is for the address/port squid listens on for incoming client connections to the proxy, not what it uses to initiate outbound HTTP connections. The tcp_outgoing_address directive is what controls the source IP of outbound requests to web servers. > > > I've been > > using this kind of setup/configuration for quite some time (since the > squid > > 2.7 days), so I believe something between FreeBSD 9.x and 10.1 has broken > > this behavior. FWIW squid 3.3.3 on FreeBSD 9.x behaves correctly with the > > same config. My understanding is that squid merely changes the source > > address as a hint to the kernel routing stack, which makes me believe the > > problem lies outside of squid. I've already sought out help from the > > squid-users mailing list and been told the same thing. > ... > > root# netstat -rn | grep default > > > > default 192.168.92.2 UGS em0 > > Do you have a route for 10.8.8.10 and similar? Those should point to > em1, obviously. If there is no specific route, those packets will > simply go to the default gateway. > 10.8.8.10 is an alias configured on em1. root# ifconfig em1 em1: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=9b ether 00:0c:29:a3:33:7f inet 10.8.8.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 nd6 options=9 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active root# netstat -rn | grep em1 10.8.8.0/24 link#1 U em1 Is that not sufficient for the kernel to know that packets with a source IP of 10.8.8.10 should egress em1, which has 10.8.8.10 configured via ifconfig? If I using ping -S the packets go out the correct interface (e.g., ping -S 10.8.8.10 10.8.8.250). > > -Dimitry > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 22:09:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ACD991752 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E4F1F45; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ncrogers@gmail.com) Received: by ykdr198 with SMTP id r198so22494070ykd.3; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ds0cvZp6h+N7aMRnth3XrNnDNc/PWoB0IO+0nPw7rXQ=; b=ZtmkUQbsGaUxGWZRs5lANt2ArWGjKqwY63h1V+kRPE5ZAIq20N7GRi96UtEczLM7fB RA42Zm1Ol4A9iEPn/HCpN69Wx+425VJmzmman7BTF0cozRXZEv9+LWqal14EcIJcrSOr spILQM/32i8avTpeSZwWB/FU9ircsXA3NyAzUuEoT9F+akmScwt1NYj4WCL9VGJoapfS AgjVh+aNBDAfFV5vtGyUazpf0PF7HjkdO6M82xkebQnMoqxEmZ4xqk7Wzvj4yeD1WULM C1/NKI6sL29Tx8Sxt7bdzajF7pcHzFOb6GZyzAL+hCaQkb8r3pmC0Rd/H7yRNmM5h+Jg Zpiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.170.44.79 with SMTP id 76mr28199535ykm.11.1435702138679; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.203.211 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:08:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <10633AE6-097E-4F08-AEA0-8E78632F2BCD@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:08:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/squid: tcp_outgoing_address binds to wrong interface From: Nick Rogers To: Dimitry Andric Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:09:00 -0000 On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Nick Rogers wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:48, Nick Rogers wrote: >> ... >> > I am experiencing an issue with squid 3.5.5 and FreeBSD 10.1 where >> > tcp_outgoing_address correctly rewrites the source address of outgoing >> > packets, but fails to bind the socket to the correct interface. >> >> How do you arrive at this conclusion? In the rest of your mail I see no >> squid configuration for this, e.g. you would have to use: >> >> http_port 10.8.8.10:3129 >> >> to explicitly bind to the first address on em1. You can add multiple >> http_port settings to bind to multiple addresses. >> > > The http_port directive is for the address/port squid listens on for > incoming client connections to the proxy, not what it uses to initiate > outbound HTTP connections. The tcp_outgoing_address directive is what > controls the source IP of outbound requests to web servers. > > >> >> > I've been >> > using this kind of setup/configuration for quite some time (since the >> squid >> > 2.7 days), so I believe something between FreeBSD 9.x and 10.1 has >> broken >> > this behavior. FWIW squid 3.3.3 on FreeBSD 9.x behaves correctly with >> the >> > same config. My understanding is that squid merely changes the source >> > address as a hint to the kernel routing stack, which makes me believe >> the >> > problem lies outside of squid. I've already sought out help from the >> > squid-users mailing list and been told the same thing. >> ... >> > root# netstat -rn | grep default >> > >> > default 192.168.92.2 UGS em0 >> >> Do you have a route for 10.8.8.10 and similar? Those should point to >> em1, obviously. If there is no specific route, those packets will >> simply go to the default gateway. >> > > 10.8.8.10 is an alias configured on em1. > > root# ifconfig em1 > em1: flags=8943 metric 0 > mtu 1500 > options=9b > ether 00:0c:29:a3:33:7f > inet 10.8.8.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.8.8.255 > nd6 options=9 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active > root# netstat -rn | grep em1 > 10.8.8.0/24 link#1 U em1 > > Is that not sufficient for the kernel to know that packets with a source > IP of 10.8.8.10 should egress em1, which has 10.8.8.10 configured via > ifconfig? If I using ping -S the packets go out the correct interface > (e.g., ping -S 10.8.8.10 10.8.8.250). > > I believe I understand your point now... There is no way to specify a route based on the source IP of the packet, thus it will always egress the default route interface even though the desired source IP is configured on a different interface. I suppose I can handle the source-based routing with PF. Thank you. > >> >> -Dimitry >> >> > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 04:43:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8095991950 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B493F1ED5 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t614hJrE026616 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:43:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199703] [revive port] multimedia/tovid A suite of tools for creating video DVDs Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:43:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:43:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199703 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|xmj@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 04:44:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C1199198C for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A491F77 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t614iudL028345 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:44:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187884] [PATCH] science/minc2: update to 2.2.00 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:44:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:44:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187884 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|xmj@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 04:45:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A2D99199D for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D80C1FF2 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t614j4JD028486 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 04:45:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193798] net-im/skype obsolete version, but problem on upgrade to newer Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:45:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:45:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193798 Johannes Jost Meixner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|xmj@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 05:12:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8334E9926E6 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 05:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE6E11E1 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 05:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t615C9nW099641 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 05:12:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199703] [revive port] multimedia/tovid A suite of tools for creating video DVDs Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:12:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 05:12:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199703 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa, patch Assignee|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org |koobs@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 11:38:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA5A98D82C for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83172CA5 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E3E4098D829; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AA698D827; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2102CA3; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:38:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by wgqq4 with SMTP id q4so34262769wgq.1; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:38:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SusvODW+FylsPA6+ygNgxTSMIUHLWkggiRirT1PkJOQ=; b=g//nNNhkm8OdAIdtlQL0P2QpXPLKsZ4fHeC4NEzp9mTrzZFH0qN5/vh2yVLvdwLOLA rZTFebDA3LJKNBYy/uHCInSaagt/rg+5VBRg4p7944d6IvDsM5GRprjbb+IXst70dEVI RDYE921p2Dsi1hGWnGrGNAKu/AvaXGkekgwwSEbXJpclYJazs3MTp4cEenW/R/J+48PK CTj6IBwR5iC+6f0Sf41G3wr4Oh/yknmuFeM1cHJxzEj6r1RKgpwJP94qGtwnSMsKgmqS 3CxyUYEaTFpnvEslEQvS56EvcBY6nUgjSNxVX+l9APIOAeDN4Sq1PbsbuxV9aeZh2Bm4 cSjg== X-Received: by 10.180.74.210 with SMTP id w18mr5606812wiv.77.1435750731029; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n8sm2983231wiy.19.2015.07.01.04.38.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2015 04:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:38:47 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov , ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out Message-ID: <20150701113847.GA15161@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150414200459.GE39658@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150421103454.GR1394@zxy.spb.ru> <5593D0AE.2010205@selasky.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5593D0AE.2010205@selasky.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 11:38:53 -0000 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. > > >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Is there a way the external SAT solver functionality can be memory=20 > optimised? When trying to use this feature having +750 packages=20 > installed, the memory usage starts growing and growing beyond 4GBytes=20 > until PKG segfaults, even before the CNF export has started. >=20 > env SAT_SOLVER=3Dmysolver pkg upgrade Probably, but given the little amount of time pkg developers has we will gr= eatly appreciate patches :) AKA this would be greatly appreciated, but very low on the priority list :( Best regards, Bapt --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlWT0UcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex8/gCeMHpS4q0e9V6xVa8aCj9uSPLO U1kAoLiweMzu0Lz1lZYjC9Vr4lxOCJuN =4AiX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 11:35:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09F998D667 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC9A2BE7 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9B87898D65B; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9AA98D659; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59362BDD; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62F2E1FE022; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:35:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5593D0AE.2010205@selasky.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:36:14 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Slawa Olhovchenkov , Baptiste Daroussin CC: ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out References: <20150414200459.GE39658@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150421103454.GR1394@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20150421103454.GR1394@zxy.spb.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 11:35:22 -0000 On 04/21/15 12:34, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:05:00PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. > Hi, Is there a way the external SAT solver functionality can be memory optimised? When trying to use this feature having +750 packages installed, the memory usage starts growing and growing beyond 4GBytes until PKG segfaults, even before the CNF export has started. env SAT_SOLVER=mysolver pkg upgrade --HPS From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 13:36:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E3F990981 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A982B03 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2DF0799097F; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D68599097E for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:36:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp205.alice.it (smtp205.alice.it [82.57.200.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D1D2B02 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (87.16.60.30) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 555621530CD5A519 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:36:14 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t61DaDQ1018819 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:36:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <5593ECCD.5090601@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:36:13 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Samba 3.6 -> 4.2 upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:36:18 -0000 Hello. Since 3.6 has been EOLed I'd like to upgrade all my such Samba installations to 4.2. Right now I don't want to switch any of them to AD; I just want to keep running as I do now, but with a supported version. So far I've been able to upgrade some servers with the following steps: _ stop Samba; _ uninstall samba36; _ install samba42; _ replace "samba_enable" with "samba_server_enable" in /etc/rc.conf; _ rename /usr/local/etc/smb.conf to /usr/local/etc/smb4.conf; _ move /usr/local/etc/samba/smbpasswd to /var/db/samba4/private; _ restart Samba. This worked on servers running on smbpasswd backend; however I'm now trying on a PDC which uses LDAP as backend and it's not that easy. I also moved /usr/local/etc/samba/schannel_store.tdb and /usr/local/etc/samba/secrets.tdb to /var/db/samba4/private, but still I had no luck. Am I overseeing something obvious? Is there any howto for this? Does anything need to be done on the LDAP schema? Anything else? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jul 1 14:36:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B55599198C; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@absolight.fr) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123FD1AC6; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:36:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@absolight.fr) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBACFBDC6E; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:36:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at absolight.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.808 tagged_above=-200 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.692, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1DE23BDC64; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:36:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:36:05 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-announce@freebsd.org Subject: New 2015Q3 branch Message-ID: <20150701143603.GA2340@prod2.absolight.net> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:36:12 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The 2015Q3 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2015Q3 branch A lot of things happened in the last three months: - pkg 1.5.4 - New USES: waf, gnustep, jpeg - Default version of Perl switched to 5.20 - Firefox 38.0.6 - Firefox-esr 31.7.0 - Chromium 43.0.2357.130 - Ruby 2.1.6 - Perl 5.22.0 Next quarterly package builds will start on tomorrow and should be available on your closest mirrors few days later. For those stat nerds out there, here's what happened during the last 3 mont= hs on head: Number of commits: 7829 Number of committers: 153 Most active committers: 1741 sunpoet 1458 amdmi3 280 bapt 234 mat 219 antoine 190 olgeni 188 jbeich 182 marino 162 swills 141 adamw and on the 2015Q2 branch: Number of commits: 305 Number of committers: 39 Most active committers: 112 amdmi3 33 delphij 27 antoine 21 jbeich 14 riggs 11 sunpoet 11 rene 6 truckman 6 bdrewery 5 xmj Diffstat: 768 files changed, 20947 insertions(+), 22176 deletions(-) Regards, --=20 Mathieu Arnold --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJVk/rTXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IWyAQAIT+3JYyfan4VxF0J1fpwiot a4tiGVHb7Ev+v0OhbBM13yjK9ON+simiqTremFPFgOq64A3SJVMdNnRCAUR892Fj 5jNvCnYULbVB/U5wPmec1i7kMgihqrc0yCRuN8U2o2RyE0JjLmo1Xj3vyuuluZhH +tBbPf/7mHPeWYjYIvTmNwZg9h6DpXKKp3GttIlZp1bza47/JKJxRJMuytqGK/hV +gpjkqbhsvP7Vn+mtr+b38/zFPWTnY/AWtdiJ5AUkErZ4mxLP4guII2ExeJWAE6I 6DUahY/AeXbplokAC8k93Tsl5KyhTz53bMlK6TbfspMxk2SjcgX6n0Tv8nhAYxvy piZk23XNjhXC8L+DMjDmnanTuxPYqeBx7GuUOY02d3YRyBoGo2esGfjlomltjDmF kN/x4eOlfIYBZhNfuqNgQCY5rIQ3NIi7uVksVLF0+SwosXmLk+FVXsL0bmdmtBS/ L+gP3uW5PC0cT7yTyjDhzDzkT065yz2hzh5RqgyzPF+7826jADPbQ4RhZzN6/ayx MaQDX9FXmKElOtOO/iBgSGKphEcvFWy/2kzr9uPo8BdUmhuIQRs+PZ4rWBN8VHnd gO97fvf4pJoPQJyhqT8zJl7+b7q9p55ojeuPQuYCWjlrWkWW8RjwpJA3nwCj9+7U oY6iZNYXoRhWZbfE66G+ =IQ3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 09:42:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1528D991C93 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F2F18EA for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F2C2F991C91; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14D9991C90 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30E718E9 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t629gEv6022922 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t629gE26022921; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201507020942.t629gE26022921@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:42:14 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:42:15 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/gifsicle | 1.87 | 1.88 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 11:01:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39205992BDE for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from smtp.mimar.rs (smtp.mimar.rs [193.53.106.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14671C93 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A589B0D for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:00:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:organization:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date :date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1435834854; x= 1437649255; bh=xi/KJBWtE+AK4AhwMqTgNMjK9fJz+A0MQQ7pbsgefI8=; b=B 71C1B2ZyURdW2+0UlXCTPWvvWUdlr3v67FRptBvlT6ZVyJ9tN+nwvB+fDLQDIL57 LJfMLXdXnfZ3v4d0EA0bcXV/sandwCjeegpfGuLl6d+TK+Xy/fE6wyi7PMGcY71B jESRLxEAnYHE11sQ8yRDw8lZh5H1b4spWwUq9oReWk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from smtp.mimar.rs ([193.53.106.135]) by vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9f6FckMDPcHK for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:00:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from efreet (unknown [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C87789AD2 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:00:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:00:53 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: net-im/ejabberd: some config options renamed? Message-ID: <20150702130053.62467264@efreet> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:01:11 -0000 Hi, I have just upgraded to ejabberd-15.06_1. I like new 'configuration checking of launch' feature, which warned me about change of syntax for mod_fail2ban (or perhaps I had it wrong but I didn't know it). mod_fail2ban: - c2s_auth_block_lifetime: 3600 + c2s_auth_ban_lifetime: 3600 c2s_max_auth_failures: 20 Also: -s2s_policy: s2s_access +s2s_access: s2s_access access: s2s_access: bad_servers: deny all: allow I guess they need some time to make changes in documentation, as http://docs.ejabberd.im/admin/guide/configuration/ still has references to both c2s_auth_block_lifetime and s2s_policy. Hope this helps someone. --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 15:34:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBFF992E0E for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D437E1C41 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CFCF6992E0C; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC9992E09; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: from mail.astabis.com (mail.astabis.com [148.251.238.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747A41C3E; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: from mail.astabis.com (localhost [148.251.238.58]) by mail.astabis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D60FD8183; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:28:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at astabis.com Received: from mail.astabis.com ([148.251.238.58]) by mail.astabis.com (mail.astabis.com [148.251.238.58]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Kciwl1pLAgub; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:28:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ashkenazi (42.Red-79-154-98.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.154.98.42]) by mail.astabis.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 82FBCFD8182; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:28:11 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Albert_Gab=C3=A0s_|_Astabis?= To: Cc: Subject: FreeBSD Port: python27-2.7.9_1 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: <000101d0b4db$b5ba5730$212f0590$@astabis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Sensitivity: Company-Confidential Thread-Index: AdC02nSnNKKMHy65RbW2Y9OXNLUQsA== Content-Language: es Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:34:55 -0000 Dear port maintainer, =20 Please, could you update the port to the latest version (2.7.10)?? =20 Thank you!! -- Albert Gab=C3=A0s - Astabis Information Risk Management =20 Barcelona: +34 931 980 181 | Madrid: +34 911 333 071 United Kingdom: +44 203 695 2195 | Israel: +97 248 847 344 =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 16:11:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B414C99338D for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D052EDB for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8FCA899338B; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2DD99338A; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 574012ED9; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pacws9 with SMTP id ws9so43401663pac.0; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R6HuXriBpAciOg1gE9XpunWShZxB/keYFdoszVw6/18=; b=r4mUAzY3J6+ksbxr/6DuiZM/3MCaT+VpPf+TsWwsHHLXJUfQ85abhNfX0iCh0UJJ0l smSq6nPzKxDgI+bRkAdJrZ08IFGFSZVHYc7TKN6xjkMRuT3QnW4JlzjVyKD7kv75E2XP iq8lKdp7zhEh0uXWK1aFBKFVtoVdoQpwr5FywqNO5QcE+GFt3Kzmj7d1byO8saU0vNeU CX61o8/ByGkmcMXm7/2qEpNA9fG3Jv8UpZdBGPzjwKeXFlPvxD1zqJZNkiLDValPgKkL vA6/xjHdIvWSIG7Ye+zsH5TpXhl3E4jebBZdJfGVRmIJ7sx+8p5lFe4k7mkcOX7+XQHC qbDA== X-Received: by 10.68.200.69 with SMTP id jq5mr67609709pbc.111.1435853490577; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::1? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0001.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oa14sm6161483pdb.47.2015.07.02.09.11.28 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: python27-2.7.9_1 References: <000101d0b4db$b5ba5730$212f0590$@astabis.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Albert_Gab=c3=a0s_|_Astabis?= Cc: python@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <559562A9.7050305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 02:11:21 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000101d0b4db$b5ba5730$212f0590$@astabis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:11:31 -0000 On 3/07/2015 1:28 AM, Albert Gabàs | Astabis wrote: > Dear port maintainer, > > Please, could you update the port to the latest version (2.7.10)?? It's in progress :) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201088 https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2637 ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 18:06:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FBF9935A8 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDAD1E7A for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E929D9935A6; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83BB9935A4; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: from mail.astabis.com (mail.astabis.com [148.251.238.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB18E1E77; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agabas@astabis.com) Received: from mail.astabis.com (localhost [148.251.238.58]) by mail.astabis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B6EFD8183; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:06:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at astabis.com Received: from mail.astabis.com ([148.251.238.58]) by mail.astabis.com (mail.astabis.com [148.251.238.58]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WM-K0C6nWqjp; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ashkenazi (42.Red-79-154-98.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.154.98.42]) by mail.astabis.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 63CC8FD8182; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:06:20 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Albert_Gab=C3=A0s_|_Astabis?= To: Cc: , References: <000101d0b4db$b5ba5730$212f0590$@astabis.com> <559562A9.7050305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <559562A9.7050305@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: python27-2.7.9_1 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:06:20 +0200 Message-ID: <000001d0b4f1$cd97a590$68c6f0b0$@astabis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQGzKv2e0apuUTLrPNUesoSiRKomAgJDvkQgnfFs6BA= Content-Language: es X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:06:24 -0000 Dear Kubilay, Ok, thanks for your good work. :) Kind regards -- Albert Gab=C3=A0s - Astabis Information Risk Management Barcelona: +34 931 980 181 | Madrid: +34 911 333 071 United Kingdom: +44 203 695 2195 | Israel: +97 248 847 344 > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Kubilay Kocak [mailto:koobs.freebsd@gmail.com] En nombre de = Kubilay > Kocak > Enviado el: jueves, 02 de julio de 2015 18:11 > Para: Albert Gab=C3=A0s | Astabis > CC: python@FreeBSD.org; ports@FreeBSD.org > Asunto: Re: FreeBSD Port: python27-2.7.9_1 >=20 > On 3/07/2015 1:28 AM, Albert Gab=C3=A0s | Astabis wrote: > > Dear port maintainer, > > > > Please, could you update the port to the latest version (2.7.10)?? >=20 > It's in progress :) >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201088 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2637 >=20 > ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 2 18:10:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80A49936F2 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57291FE5 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A20A59936EF; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16869936EE; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:6a29:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70FE31FE2; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@odo.in-berlin.de) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: python27-2.7.9_1 From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <559562A9.7050305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:10:28 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <000101d0b4db$b5ba5730$212f0590$@astabis.com> <559562A9.7050305@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail.mer-waases.invalid X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:10:41 -0000 On 02.07.2015, at 18:11, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 3/07/2015 1:28 AM, Albert Gab=C3=A0s | Astabis wrote: >> Please, could you update the port to the latest version (2.7.10)?? >=20 > It's in progress :) >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201088 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2637 Great news! This will enable my servers to become migrated to libressl. Thanks, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 09:37:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCB59906B9 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEF22566 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so221353768wiw.0 for ; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:37:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=+nUZQTRmVT5ytR8eAoXmCSSnJC97Z5jYt+xBlttUC2Y=; b=RBdE23KrVQezNLIXn81Jh6/P0rfPfTbu20/baZy890k1p1xlIlefjF/jQiO8Cy95p3 CbzNkPf8FzwB9gk8jF+aSp/0ZDNp1A6fDrcddZs5PD3V4PCgLI64h8U+26tItuTw6HPv SUGPEEa8fRNSufFgQnBuzLjx1Vcghj3Bf7VLVIP0aB/fjQLBa1YkTgZgKWyn7NpG8g/i nPVLgbS9+lNUt6heziMjAsgYlNzdHrNnXxMZE0RE629gg4Us4Dv3QNJp9yVdsWzmO3Ij oWCiU8GxYUE+T/52gW+az94pK2wcvYiJXeydrq4spfJsOn7zBtdEB0S2FBnspxbdbjlN /sWA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDTbVvby9dfyA9J03Z7yivvsgbH3NN249YYMaj+lV6yvkuJdlhwIo2SxuEYpxPtLBxKMOu X-Received: by 10.180.13.171 with SMTP id i11mr63603293wic.5.1435916252315; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (misc-users-pat-19-132.isys.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.19.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ul1sm12477272wjc.30.2015.07.03.02.37.31 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t639bU72036432 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:37:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t639bUTS036431 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:37:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:37:30 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201507030937.t639bUTS036431@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: help update cad/z88 port Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:37:40 -0000 I'm stuck on the patching stage: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201250 Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 09:54:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6D6990B2F for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B292D34 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 36BD7990B2E; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36457990B2D for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A992D33 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t639sQ16024856 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t639sQNb024855; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201507030954.t639sQNb024855@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:54:26 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 09:54:26 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/axis2 | 1.6.2 | 1.6.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 13:01:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCBF993B1E for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB50C2D09 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t63D13sB074822 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:01:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t63D13Tx074821 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:01:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 06:01:03 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Please help un-confuse me about vuxml Message-ID: <20150703130103.GM1472@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ensexbfp9Ul6anXl" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:01:11 -0000 --ensexbfp9Ul6anXl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Before I get started on something that is likely to devolve into something a bit "rant-ish," I will take this opportunity to thank the folks who work on things such as maintaining ports, the port- and package-building infrastructure, and maintaining the vulnerability database(s). (For about 3 decades of my career, I worked in sysadmin(-like) positions; I'm familiar with the value of well-maintained infrastructure... and that infrastructure and those who maintain it usually get noticed when something is perceived to be "wrong.") That said, as the Subject indicates, I'm confused about something.... Upon an initial successful smoke test after a src update of FreeBSD, it is my practice to then update the installed ports. As I do this moderately frequently (generally, daily), I build the ports (rather than rely on externally-built packages). I use portmaster(8) to do this (and have been doing so for several years). Today, the ports selected for update (after addressing the ffmpeg update) were: =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Upgrade R-cran-stringi-0.5.2_1 to R-cran-stringi-0.5.5 Upgrade harfbuzz-0.9.40_1 to harfbuzz-0.9.41 Upgrade iso-codes-3.57 to iso-codes-3.59 Upgrade netpbm-10.35.94_1 to netpbm-10.35.96 Upgrade openjdk-7.80.15,1 to openjdk-7.80.15_1,1 Upgrade p5-DateTime-1.19 to p5-DateTime-1.20 Upgrade p5-DateTime-TimeZone-1.92 to p5-DateTime-TimeZone-1.92_1 Upgrade mplayer-1.1.r20150403_2 to mplayer-1.1.r20150403_3 Upgrade wireshark-1.12.5_1 to wireshark-1.12.6 =3D=3D=3D>>> Proceed? y/n [y]=20 As indicated, I told it to proceed (while I directed my focus elsewhere). I was thus a bit startled (and yes, annoyed) a few minutes later to see: | ... | =3D=3D=3D>>> Deleting stale distfile: iso-codes-3.57.tar.xz | 0;portmaster: All (9)^G=3D=3D=3D>>> Returning to update check of installe= d ports |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to install graphics/netpbm |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> All >> graphics/netpbm (4/9) | 0;portmaster: All >> graphics/netpbm (4/9)^G | =3D=3D=3D>>> Currently installed version: netpbm-10.35.94_1 | =3D=3D=3D>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/graphics/netpbm |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> Starting check for build dependencies | =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for graphics/netpbm from ports | =3D=3D=3D>>> Dependency check complete for graphics/netpbm |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> All >> netpbm-10.35.94_1 (4/9) | 0;portmaster: All >> netpbm-10.35.94_1 (4/9)^G | =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for netpbm-10.35.96 | =3D=3D=3D> netpbm-10.35.96 has known vulnerabilities: | netpbm-10.35.96 is vulnerable: | dcraw -- integer overflow condition | CVE: CVE-2015-3885 | WWW: https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/57325ecf-facc-11e4-968f-b888e347c6= 38.html |=20 | 1 problem(s) in the installed packages found. | =3D> Please update your ports tree and try again. | =3D> Note: Vulnerable ports are marked as such even if there is no update= available. | =3D> If you wish to ignore this vulnerability rebuild with 'make DISABLE_= VULNERABILITIES=3Dyes' | *** Error code 1 |=20 | Stop. | make[1]: stopped in /common/ports/graphics/netpbm | *** Error code 1 |=20 | Stop. | make: stopped in /common/ports/graphics/netpbm |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for graphics/netpbm | =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for graphics/netpbm failed | =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions were performed: | Upgrade of R-cran-stringi-0.5.2_1 to R-cran-stringi-0.5.5 | Upgrade of harfbuzz-0.9.40_1 to harfbuzz-0.9.41 | Upgrade of iso-codes-3.57 to iso-codes-3.59 |=20 | =3D=3D=3D>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command = line: | portmaster graphics/netpbm java/openjdk7 devel/p5-DateTime= devel/p5-DateTime-TimeZone multimedia/mplayer net/wireshark=20 |=20 I then turned my attention to my /usr/ports SVN working copy to check the update log for graphics/netpbm/Makefile; the most recent entry was: | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | r391058 | feld | 2015-07-01 06:28:35 -0700 (Wed, 01 Jul 2015) | 6 lines |=20 | Update to 10.35.96 |=20 | CVE-2015-3885 fix is included |=20 | Approved by: ports-secteam (with hat) |=20 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ And that combination of things catalyzed this note. Here's what I'm seeing: - There is a claim that the port to which I was trying to update was "vulnerable" per vuxml. - The vuxml entry effectively required human intervention to update the port. - The most recent update to the port itself claimed that it had a fix to address said vulnerability. (This gives one reason to wonder why *this* version of the port had a vuxml entry, then.) - I had no feasible way to have a clue about any of this until the artificial failure disrupted the usual update process. - As far as I can tell, there was no value in the existence of the vuxml entry for this port under these circumstances. Rather, it was merely annoying and disruptive, for no gain whatsoever. There wasn't even an UPDATING entry to warn a person about what was going on. So... what am I missing? How is a vuxml entry for ports/graphics/netpbm @r391058 that claims it's vulnerable per CVE-2015-3885 useful or helpful? Thanks.... Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --ensexbfp9Ul6anXl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVloeOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7xWsP/06BxH/501qOvBSgDtDej9uP +aJVUpY2nYQFRoNauOxV4J+jzfW6HdGEZMkGJIwRAAHLEH4DLvNzRmtMyLhGF2fF axUl8CytogiOSTsWNsSq0QDUtLKDXFF5s+AHyLamtGgtK8zEy3fsi5zj8404r1eD GqX0TKphSHFQzBrDMNShFz6gFxDY5OJAGhXvV1t2bEuIOx/lOmMFKhaivahFGq5z mdxKzLM0vcyiCKwtX2+zRM4EjsJPDJSx08GO4pT5v94KBqexlvcZN1egV2uzqNlr Ogn9p1oUlFBfSrE/mDRM+079umN697iB4b4Uo1KGHKt3Rsv1uK/49RqYLm3GjKlP F4XVRuFxJEZo+SDnx0p66ckNTNcyTbR+VcM0NU3JK/+30DreHVWCiZUiVRu+0y5n Eb+jGt16+G9sD82gqeTCX/y7kE0k2jWb1y7oac19cLI/+8oagE+/N1aBBIUqV3oA 5hXcxKO3Bvl1cjaXTjIjdCuHXQQI7wAbuEofAt7Yc6JHksh30nARWyo+vR8EsZgL irku2/KfGUcTs05gwyg5ed84dCVXWzropR8WJU06gz6nP6C2wbCkuZcSOPPxuXGj ySjPN9QKGKuw5WcFFpSbgcGMPCsHyF+qsd3ufTWG3kRCOGT7247/sgzPtDKV8+Gy ZXsirLhGTO2xbKrLyiDN =ajw7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ensexbfp9Ul6anXl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 13:36:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9B199424E for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE2114BB for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t63DaDG7067963 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:36:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t63DaDG7067963 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t63DaDG7067963; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be zero-gravitas.local Message-ID: <55968FC5.5010503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 14:36:05 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wolfskill , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please help un-confuse me about vuxml References: <20150703130103.GM1472@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20150703130103.GM1472@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3X7c0nWuvFbqMleCnvTNGGnaCei1apn9m" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:36:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3X7c0nWuvFbqMleCnvTNGGnaCei1apn9m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015/07/03 14:01, David Wolfskill wrote: > And that combination of things catalyzed this note. >=20 > Here's what I'm seeing: > - There is a claim that the port to which I was trying to update was > "vulnerable" per vuxml. vuxml currently states that netpbm versions /less than/ 10.35.96 are vulnerable, and has done since about 48h ago. Given that the latest available version of netpbm is now 10.35.96 (committed at right about the same time as the vuxml update) you should be able to upgrade to that without problems. No idea why portmaster is getting this wrong. > - The vuxml entry effectively required human intervention to update > the port. > > - The most recent update to the port itself claimed that it had a > fix to address said vulnerability. (This gives one reason to > wonder why *this* version of the port had a vuxml entry, then.) This is what the vuxml says: netpbm 10.35.96 Which means that 10.35.95 or anything earlier is vulnerable, but 10.35.96 and above is not. > - I had no feasible way to have a clue about any of this until the > artificial failure disrupted the usual update process. For a second opinion on what vulnerabilities you may have, try 'pkg audit -F' (which will work just fine no matter if you're installing pre-compiled pkgs or building your own from ports). > - As far as I can tell, there was no value in the existence of the vuxm= l > entry for this port under these circumstances. Rather, it was merely= > annoying and disruptive, for no gain whatsoever. There wasn't even a= n > UPDATING entry to warn a person about what was going on. There's no requirement that a fixed version be available from ports before vuxml gets updated. Quite the opposite in fact. Admins should be informed if they are running vulnerable software so they can take some sort of ameliorative action even if the official fix is not yet published. Why would you expect an UPDATING entry here? Documenting every vulnerability in the ports isn't what UPDATING is for. Only if the way you would need to fix the vulnerability involved doing more than a simple upgrade would that be legitimate UPDATING territory. > So... what am I missing? How is a vuxml entry for ports/graphics/netpb= m > @r391058 that claims it's vulnerable per CVE-2015-3885 useful or > helpful? A vuxml entry in general tells you what is vulnerable and gives you the chance to do something about it -- even if what you do is to consider the nature of the vulnerability and decide that it's an acceptable risk in your environment and so simply ignore it -- rather than the alternative of discovering there was a vulnerability because your machine has now been compromised... Another response (for the sufficiently paranoid) might have been to delete the vulnerable package and do without it until the fix was availab= le. Although I have no idea why that particular version of netpbm was being flagged as vulnerable for you. Cheers, Matthew --3X7c0nWuvFbqMleCnvTNGGnaCei1apn9m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVlo/NXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnvWEQAIc4WyRfxMJQc9oXPJdUNzHG sTz+7A+gHfmqriYXPSzVyCwev7Og7BNazSdvwjlnz1zh4Y7FS7q5jx8NYqesW1wy l23tZ8E4AQ3LUpT/vrVHvPFQZQRZVkXWoN4JjWEPqTdYaOs+WwtED+TJh59rTeUR DitdmZQ1mmEh61CYq+Wt/t7U8sZXIx8IDhGj/Qudw4RkKpgpmdQaokEUaG5FL3gK +6D1A1haSp4xZlgXXXqz7nXM8pqzgm6ZcmBmwjqjwEv8UiJIQGgVDYkPz+pJxt8U BOM9O1KYb1mbeASysg7wXO5R6wB8eUt3d6LM4EhWJoKpRwvR8m7AhZ0Qm6ZiiRRZ H7unf+m60er7fDA85YOxY1ZDptPqJ/QLU5tM2XizBKLzhKQG6HI8XxFD+QG5cK13 5ys4zOxqId2PawVDsp1rwG6fLpc0o5TUFTp9ukadKFlGpZhX0oJTS3ez2MQNf3hb ye2Fke4+/gQIYp3z99pS2bkSso0gx8CB5rBpINdfm1nsbYJWls4Nokr+oYufJPCT RZtNtkSSKqsqdNYUcbK87Pc8JqbaFh44lrS8YOyjzewD4QAvUr2GAwcuFhBT5d9B KNL2AYyf4Z7k+o/lyKozZ6fjxYTteJXHmSyVZKXBG2c/QkzzdBBHmnDX1JzJ9RUN D4apd3rwx/zgJ/lchDXG =j11y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3X7c0nWuvFbqMleCnvTNGGnaCei1apn9m-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 14:34:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9611F994D9F for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6056F1654 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t63EYML0076719 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 07:34:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t63EYL5x076718 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 07:34:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 07:34:21 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please help un-confuse me about vuxml Message-ID: <20150703143421.GN1472@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20150703130103.GM1472@albert.catwhisker.org> <55968FC5.5010503@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bebzX59uVWocTrAI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55968FC5.5010503@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 14:34:23 -0000 --bebzX59uVWocTrAI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/07/03 14:01, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > vuxml currently states that netpbm versions /less than/ 10.35.96 are > vulnerable, and has done since about 48h ago. Hmmmm.... > Given that the latest available version of netpbm is now 10.35.96 > (committed at right about the same time as the vuxml update) you should > be able to upgrade to that without problems. My ports working copy is (and was; I use a local private mirror that I update shortly before I begin the daily update cycle): g1-254(10.2-P)[1] svn info /usr/ports/ Path: /usr/ports Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: file:///svn/freebsd/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: file:///svn/freebsd/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 391226 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: olgeni Last Changed Rev: 391226 Last Changed Date: 2015-07-03 02:34:33 -0700 (Fri, 03 Jul 2015) g1-254(10.2-P)[2]=20 > No idea why portmaster is getting this wrong. Well, it's a small relief that what I'm seeing & reporting is considered "wrong" by someone else, at least. :-} > > - The vuxml entry effectively required human intervention to update > > the port. > > > > - The most recent update to the port itself claimed that it had a > > fix to address said vulnerability. (This gives one reason to > > wonder why *this* version of the port had a vuxml entry, then.) >=20 > This is what the vuxml says: >=20 > > netpbm > 10.35.96 > >=20 > Which means that 10.35.95 or anything earlier is vulnerable, but > 10.35.96 and above is not. OK. > > - I had no feasible way to have a clue about any of this until the > > artificial failure disrupted the usual update process. >=20 > For a second opinion on what vulnerabilities you may have, try 'pkg > audit -F' (which will work just fine no matter if you're installing > pre-compiled pkgs or building your own from ports). In this case, I was not so much concerned about vulnerabilities per se, as I was to disruptions in the "normal" course of the ports update. (And I quoted 'normal" in acknowledgement that it's a rather subjective qualifier, at best. :-}) For example, had portmaster looked at the list of prospective updates and let me know *before* I told it to proceed that there might be an issue with graphics/netpbm, that would have been workable. But that's only one possible implementation approach (and is not mutually exclusive with other possible approaches): I'm not trying to "specify implementation(s)" here -- merely trying to illustrate and clarify what my concern is. > > - As far as I can tell, there was no value in the existence of the vuxml > > entry for this port under these circumstances. Rather, it was merely > > annoying and disruptive, for no gain whatsoever. There wasn't even an > > UPDATING entry to warn a person about what was going on. >=20 > There's no requirement that a fixed version be available from ports > before vuxml gets updated. Quite the opposite in fact. Admins should > be informed if they are running vulnerable software so they can take > some sort of ameliorative action even if the official fix is not yet > published. Right; I understand (and understood) that. > Why would you expect an UPDATING entry here? Documenting every > vulnerability in the ports isn't what UPDATING is for. Only if the way > you would need to fix the vulnerability involved doing more than a > simple upgrade would that be legitimate UPDATING territory. In this case, the reason for an UPDATING entry would be the counterintuitive behavior of portmaster in this particular case -- though better would be to have avoided whatever caused the confusion/misunderstanding in the first place. (I don't know if other ports management tools might also get this one wrong, as I don't use them currently.) As ports/UPDATING itself says: | This file documents some of the problems you may encounter when upgrading | your ports. We try our best to minimize these disruptions, but sometimes | they are unavoidable. (And yes, I acknowledge that is has "some of," and I don't expect perfection in human endeavors in any case. But "improvement" can still be worth pursuing.) > ... > A vuxml entry in general tells you what is vulnerable and gives you the > chance to do something about it... Yes; I understand that part. > Although I have no idea why that particular version of netpbm was being > flagged as vulnerable for you. > .... And that is what left me confused. I confess (again) that I'm releived to not be alone in failing to understand why things played out as they did in my case. Thanks! :-) Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --bebzX59uVWocTrAI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVlp1tXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7RGIP/0UlcHzvYJHkK4U3bbphyCKH n1VZXBFGuRNrVocH41M4v83H1thFQYcraXvD7qb3PULKbeuyyMTlq8gOqpJApMJO Q6H2iQ09emz/NDH5wtIuGGrir8B0PrsqkkCmQek04t7HBpCOgM4NkQwnSyxo25KJ k7btxcQcX3L5nVhsxEtQvOk1HBysKNPoTl3U6gUyfzINHcw/x/5Fc2zGMYagJhrM SujlKosqTbokCwViVVFb+CXUc4Sx58FriFewGsJ9H4ocO6rWwHS3J3f8QcSJ5zOb nUd8cx+FcNHobP2exCLIqHdPu6VSvm1uVLXrLIIIM1mSyA7+RFXF5WmDcuZKF5Eg goKzygACGh8LqY32ucfzBTqCv10dI4nYnBbMtjqgJGj+4JzEY6woEU2MjfbOsExZ OOqN7Ee2NpLje8M8okYP2k0fhOyW37OA8PKdQjKwwZHo/p9x04BgouqONA8Xp6vd zltpF/xP42YUXwsPeCn/4aVZTKIP6J0kbaWQOMp6/zXI1KdJVeVs8KO6ZdI4UJBj NgrEF9Z/bx6EiRRzHq0p49zorSvFnjJoKrHyyC79eip/kGF+ydCTSIF5xdn4QFcW rDh6dRXX9A2WBWCg4jQYWVUbKxhFiWUZsSTL9tq+XaZLgDFUkofWARQBZrFoDPo0 Vh5vrXXt6e4KLiWvbosa =OQMW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bebzX59uVWocTrAI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jul 3 19:17:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC67A994338 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAF521F5; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t63JHK0o014362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:17:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t63JHKNZ014359; Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:17:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:17:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthew Seaman cc: David Wolfskill , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Please help un-confuse me about vuxml In-Reply-To: <55968FC5.5010503@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <20150703130103.GM1472@albert.catwhisker.org> <55968FC5.5010503@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:17:20 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 19:17:37 -0000 On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/07/03 14:01, David Wolfskill wrote: >> And that combination of things catalyzed this note. >> >> Here's what I'm seeing: >> - There is a claim that the port to which I was trying to update was >> "vulnerable" per vuxml. > > vuxml currently states that netpbm versions /less than/ 10.35.96 are > vulnerable, and has done since about 48h ago. I had the same problem also yesterday. It was just a bug in the netpbm entry. Date disparities are likely due to differing time zones. Tried it just now, and the problem is fixed. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 09:07:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BF89A37 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 09:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C79519C3 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 09:07:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by lagc2 with SMTP id c2so106501186lag.3 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:07:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sWMjfCRW/ToD6cgxjrXB+m+Bt63N7hJdnTk1U0lnulo=; b=Z0LvYaTyiJFXPGe/SSgYzI5g7O/gnb2oyljZJy+bzyLNffe0kqFwbayi6UzSXwhNoc b7kV6sFxWLihxK7aAchgMfsbrVSHkO/2sZVJF9g53blKB3X4uCzuI38t3V7wrOBC0It8 a/y+7l/utkETWCkhJSiCQ5wfVCHTuuokAqvgXaPhcUlmo445dlprBz0jGxiO7E2u9zV3 berGJVSNBPOUvn0uYVaU0CBuKqwUffzZZXQ7LZVN9BOjP6qEqge2KueLy8U8itqYCo7K KjcGIh4jXGHznkaBqV7wSGNx30p+HSZngvz3oNpree+ZrF5Lot0lBnqUuIH3YtMCEGnQ AibQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.42.50 with SMTP id k18mr36410858lbl.76.1436000828676; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.22.207 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 02:07:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201507030937.t639bUTS036431@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201507030937.t639bUTS036431@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 11:07:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: help update cad/z88 port From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 09:07:11 -0000 On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm stuck on the patching stage: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201250 > Your bug report was difficult to interpret; what exactly is the problem? You know about 'make makesum' to update distinfo checksums, right? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 12:01:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6386B969B for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opendaddy@hushmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8041FDB for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opendaddy@hushmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4CE12969A; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C72A9699 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opendaddy@hushmail.com) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "smtp.hushmail.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 344D61FDA for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from opendaddy@hushmail.com) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B70CC60191 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 11:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w7.hushmail.com [65.39.178.32]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 11:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id E031F41C93; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 11:24:06 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:24:06 +0000 To: ak@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrading pngquant (nasty error) From: opendaddy@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150704112406.E031F41C93@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:01:22 -0000 Hi! Getting this nasty warning here: WARN: pngquant 2.0.0 at /usr/local/bin/pngquant (< 2.1) may be lossy even with quality `100-` Any chance we could upgrade the port? Trying to use image_optim (https://github.com/toy/image_optim) with Discourse in Ruby on Rails (https://github.com/discourse/discourse): Many thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jul 4 21:15:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BCE9FC7 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 21:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raivo.hool@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517491AC3 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 21:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raivo.hool@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 504E29FC6; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 21:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC3F9FC5 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 21:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raivo.hool@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E511AC2 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2015 21:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raivo.hool@gmail.com) Received: by lagx9 with SMTP id x9so117085631lag.1 for ; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:15:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=In1PAvAz6ntr3BK+w4CDpU4iLETDs8RP5i0ZzicCWAU=; b=r17w7pD7X2VbOo5DPNwuUEQv6XhAJQMx4BHfMQyrkg6sL8qbOJkkav3V/9MOXpt/ro oFNBYbAVwI6pymOSvv4L1CMo9tPhZUrcHN4nSncy+VNQhms/nDh37XZy+jPOgU4naOHv QkHDhOZubSZ1eRwJMhzaU0bfdtUru5YtGWoy6kJnngxhR640KNFBBkGJRfcZiibY7FL7 DNnOrQTI+BZqlHm63oLufHUcc1VFVJxBgc1AQiln+aBOjEd1CgqtanmuoY9QberDnZeR XVG3UNdBdafCB7Erd2/N62fzWSHCWEaXMxUn0XD2ld1ROzLws4J/moCI8lOGIP8EHtoo Q3VA== X-Received: by 10.152.30.4 with SMTP id o4mr40642684lah.74.1436044500910; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hullu.lehma.com (1146-fecd-60ff-021d-cc01-87d8-07d0-2001.dyn.estpak.ee. [2001:7d0:87d8:cc01:21d:60ff:fecd:1146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rg6sm3360100lbb.23.2015.07.04.14.14.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Jul 2015 14:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from igiliikur.lan (Igiliikur.local [192.168.199.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: raivo@lehma.com) by hullu.lehma.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5845C2054 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:14:56 +0300 (EEST) From: Raivo Hool Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: building multimedia/ffmpeg results in tons of 'undefined references' Message-Id: Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:14:54 +0300 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 21:15:03 -0000 FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE from mid-June on a Core2Duo. Building multimedia/ffmpeg invariably fails for me like this: MAN doc/ffprobe.1 MAN doc/ffmpeg-all.1 MAN doc/ffprobe-all.1 MAN doc/ffmpeg-utils.1 libavcodec/libavcodec.so: undefined reference to `ff_dcadsp_init_x86' libavcodec/libavcodec.so: undefined reference to `ff_ttadsp_init_x86' libavcodec/libavcodec.so: undefined reference to `ff_dwt_init_x86' libavcodec/libavcodec.so: undefined reference to `ff_bswapdsp_init_x86' libavcodec/libavcodec.so: undefined reference to `ff_h264dsp_init_x86' libavcodec/libavcodec.so: undefined reference to `ff_h263dsp_init_x86=E2=80= =99 Etc. Needless to say, the functions are nicely present within the files. Curiously enough, it is always multimedia/ffmpeg and never any of the = suffixed ffmpeg ports, such as multimedia/ffmpeg26, which did not used = to build when it was still called multimedia/ffmpeg, but now, having = gained the suffix, builds without an issue. There is no difference = whether I have a make.conf or not. No suffix - build fail. Suffix - no = problemo. Where should I look? I am completely at a loss. I have read through all = the man pages I could think of (ldconfig and ld, to be precise), = wandered in places the former recommended, and found nothing. The same = port builds fine on another FreeBSD machine that I administer. --=20 Raivo