Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 12:40:14 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG, jb@cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: binutils bloat Message-ID: <199803141140.MAA11404@sos.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <199803141117.DAA04346@dingo.cdrom.com> from Mike Smith at "Mar 14, 98 03:17:47 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Mike Smith who wrote:
> > If we are going to have crosstarget development tools, it should be
> > completely optional, preferably a port.
>
> Uh, this is cross-for-FreeBSD-on-other-architectures. Making this a
> port would, to put it succinctly, suck.
Bloating every installation with crosstools will suck even more...
Make it an option then, that's OFF by default.
And wait until we have the ELF stuff completed, this is not going
to make it any easier...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team
Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803141140.MAA11404>