From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 21:29:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B13106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:29:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4948FC15 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1St3i0-00013w-R3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:29:00 -0700 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:29:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1342992540828-5729030.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:29:01 -0000 This could be deducted, but I will add for clarity, that I bought USB 3.0 pendrive to use in 2.0 port, to take advantage of 2.0 to the fullest (as 2.0 pendrives have slow flashes inside). -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729030.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.