From owner-cvs-all Thu Mar 28 8:28:47 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BAB37B400; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:28:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2SGSFp0016178; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:28:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200203281628.g2SGSFp0016178@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:28:15 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <1017310574.580.20.camel@notebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 28 Mar, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > The whole affair (the problem spotted by knu and this one) showed that > bento testing, is important, but should not be used as a substitute > for ordinary peer review and testing, because bento's bsd.port.mk > usage pattern is quite poor. Unfortunately, I suspect that even > though my patch was available for more that two weeks but only few > individuals actually gave it a try. That's the real problem, which > needs to be addressed somehow. That's fine, actually. Only what you commit gets tested -- and fixed. Seems like a normal worflow to me -- as long as the fixing part comes promptly. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message