Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:26:17 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c Message-ID: <86k6oht386.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <422E407B.4080507@portaone.com> References: <200503070726.j277Qhp5059059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050308012939.GP11079@elvis.mu.org> <422DCF52.6080109@portaone.com> <20050308210414.GU11079@elvis.mu.org> <20050308232209.GX11079@elvis.mu.org> <422E3EC1.4050402@portaone.com> <20050309001301.GZ11079@elvis.mu.org> <422E407B.4080507@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> writes: > As I have said the binary program compiled on the newer system that > uses this flag in some cases may malfunction when executed on system > with older kernel due to the fact that that additional flag will > become no-op the program might get SIGPIPE unexpectedly. We've never cared about running newer binaries on older systems. It's the reverse that matters, and the change Alfred suggests does not break that. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k6oht386.fsf>