From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 28 11:07:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CD2D98 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0AA1C7E for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moby.local ([82.83.187.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5HZD-1ZVPKJ2NVH-00zWts; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:06:32 +0200 Message-ID: <553F699C.9030409@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:06:04 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tunneling L2 tagged traffic over IP References: <20150425174935.GA48023@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <553C1F66.4060901@gmx.com> <20150426123629.GA48916@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20150427093355.GA86151@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <553E400F.2040906@gmx.com> <20150427143952.GA94033@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <553E9A07.1020900@gmx.com> <20150428034047.GA4874@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20150428034047.GA4874@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yL2o9Fki7KeSVb3OF05yVIzqH9Tnv/GdV2ZUX9wKdbVhjEZ+V17 RFBxUtsqRCsU6eKjGfHL8oauoKM8vgLtcFabt9JGkjn1SUTYZtX/32dWBfCFgKX0pvzCDZm 6wbKXmdo7uM/Sw0FVSAgZ7VnpL6b4m1cQl2l3PKGwVBD5xFZAXzh1dabe5tXOm3f0Noza10 XVRaZqMIpfvklCWh6UV5Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:07:09 -0000 On 04/28/15 05:40, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Fine. Maybe there are other ways to tunnel Ethernet without relying on > if_bridge ? Then there is netgraph bridging, netgraph bridging AFAIK doesn't have this feature, it doesn't filter out special MACs. You can ask at net@ for a script/help I believe. > Besides, I also need to tunnel 802.1q tagged frames, so if_bridge is > unsuitable anyway. > I already tried 802.1q over bridge and gif and 802.1q frames are definitely forwarded. Could you send more info? Nikos