Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 10:21:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ALTQ integration developer preview Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205181018300.10011-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <3CE55A9B.73EA3DE4@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10205170216500.29826-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205171056200.2091-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <3CE55A9B.73EA3DE4@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, > > the "em" driver (if "gx" is already in the initial plan), because it > > reportedly works better (for example I couldn't do NFS serving with UDP > > packets bigger than the MTU with that, while the "em" driver works OK). > It *does* frag packets bigger than the MTU, right? netstat didn't show any errors regarding to that. If I used an NFS readsize, smaller than the 1500 bytes MTU it worked (was slow, but worked). netstat's frag counters were increased. I couldn't use tcpdump (I had no bpf support) to see what happens on the wire... --------[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]------- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0205181018300.10011-100000>