Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:17:55 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conditionally removing cosmetic messages for small kernels (PICOBSD). Message-ID: <20000717181754.A13979@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10007180652010.78682-100000@lion.butya.kz>; from bp@butya.kz on Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 07:06:57AM %2B0700 References: <20000717152514.A2056@mithrandr.moria.org> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10007180652010.78682-100000@lion.butya.kz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> [000717 17:07] wrote: > > A more general question: should we allow more options to exclude > optional and obsolete parts of the kernel ? For example, I've ripped out > aout, aio and jail related code without any effect on functionality for my > particular system. I'm sure our friends in the embedded systems world would say yes. :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000717181754.A13979>