From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 02:41:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C46916A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E098B43D55; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:41:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id E1C14530C; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:41:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 810E1530A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:41:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 2F66433C9A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:41:19 +0100 (CET) To: Holger.Kipp@alogis.com References: <200401061129.i06BTAY75957@alogis.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:41:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200401061129.i06BTAY75957@alogis.com> (Holger Kipp's message of "Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:29:05 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl malloc slow? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:41:29 -0000 Holger Kipp writes: > Searching on the internet gave the impression that this might be > malloc/FreeBSD related. Any chance of this being resolved? This is basically a bug in Perl (poor choice of algorithm for growing strings). Perl's malloc() implementation knows about and compensates for this bug. FreeBSD's malloc() implementation does not. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no