From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 12:07:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35F4106568B for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:07:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ccs.furiru.org (sakura.ccs.furiru.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8060::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549C18FC1F for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ccs.furiru.org (unknown) with ESMTP id n8OC7Cf6035152; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:07:15 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:07:12 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20090924.210712.162012268.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp From: Takahashi Yoshihiro In-Reply-To: <20090924112533.1377D83D2D@mail1.asahi-net.or.jp> References: <20090923164246.E5F8882365@mail1.asahi-net.or.jp> <20090923200026.GC1099@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20090924112533.1377D83D2D@mail1.asahi-net.or.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: de(4) does not work on 8.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:07:17 -0000 In article <20090924112533.1377D83D2D@mail1.asahi-net.or.jp> WATANABE Kazuhiro writes: >> I'm not familiar with de(4) and didn't have chance to read data >> sheet. So I'm not sure whether what alignment restriction the >> controller has but PAGE_SIZE alignment for descriptors looks wrong. >> As John said I think Tx buffer has no alignment limitation. Here is >> guess work, would you give it try? > > Thanks for your reply. They works well again on 8.0-RC1 with your > patch. I also use a NIC supported by de(4). The patch works fine for it. Thanks. --- TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro