Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:22:54 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi_cpu: _PDC vs _OSC Message-ID: <201002050822.54616.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4B6B4B2F.2010109@icyb.net.ua> References: <4B698DD8.4010404@icyb.net.ua> <201002041729.18714.jhb@freebsd.org> <4B6B4B2F.2010109@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 04 February 2010 5:33:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 05/02/2010 00:29 John Baldwin said the following: > > But is GCAP loading an additional SSDT? That is what the "loading something" > > refers to and I think we've only observed that occurring with _OSC. I'd > > rather we only document unexpected quirks that someone has actually reported > > and not assume that just because an _OSC method on some box did it, there's > > bound to be a _PDC method on some other box that does it. In truth, the > > comment is probably not needed now anyway since this will always do _OSC > > first. > > I agree with you. Probably the comment is too obvious or too useless now, when > such things are a common place. > To answer your first question - yes it does: Aiee, fair enough. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201002050822.54616.jhb>