From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Aug 20 12:27:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97A0537B422 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2000 12:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 60683 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2000 19:27:36 -0000 Received: from client80-30.hispeed.ch (HELO 10.2.2.100) (62.2.80.30) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 20 Aug 2000 19:27:36 -0000 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 21:29:32 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45 Beta/6) Personal Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <23125715669.20000820212932@buz.ch> To: "Matt Thomas" Cc: dchance@valuedata.net, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE is about as stable as windows98 In-reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Matt, Sunday, August 20, 2000, 8:17:17 PM, you wrote: > Ahh this sounds like the answer I have been looking for. Everyone has said > it is hardware so I moved the box to a different motherboard and processor. > And wouldn't you know it, the other motherboard that was being used for the > machine was a VIA chipset. I had noticed problems with DMA for awhile, so I'd just like to comment that we run several VIA MVP4 (Super Socket7) boxes here. All of them run just fine, so the problems seems only to apply for the P3 chipsets (Apollo Pro? or something). Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message