From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 19:13:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F99106573B for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CC88FC1F for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 3BB5778FB5; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:17 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from orthanc (mne69-8-82-247-37-160.fbx.proxad.net [82.247.37.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C4978C2B for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:13:17 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier To: FreeBSD Questions Message-Id: <20090206201317.4e0377b7.nicolas@nicoelro.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: differences of disk usage between du and quota binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:13:20 -0000 Hello. I use FreeBSD 6.3. I set quota to my fs. But, when I print disk usage with du -sh, I have: root@domain sites $ du -sh folder 633M folder But, when I print disk usage with quota -u user, I have: isk quotas for user user (uid 2002): Filesystem usage quota limit grace files quota limit grace /var 648264 700000 700000 2963 0 0 Why this difference? (633M against 648264) Regards, -- -Nicolas.