From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Mar 20 15:15:13 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24373
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:15:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24021;
          Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:13:43 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jmb)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199803202313.PAA24021@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: after the release ...
In-Reply-To: <3512E5E7.6171CD95@indy.net> from melanie b at "Mar 20, 98 04:55:51 pm"
To: magger@indy.net (melanie b)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG, fullermd@futuresouth.com, tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net,
        software@kew.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

melanie b wrote:
> While I like using cvsup you have to admit that it does take awhile and
> it is kinda inconvient to rebuild the entire source tree for a couple of
> small changes.  I'm running a K6 200 with 98Meg ram and 12G of
> diskspace, and it still takes a good while to make the whole thing.  I
> can see where a simple patch program would be excellent for just
> remaking whatever has changed in the source tree not the whole thing,
> but maybe I'm just missing the point here.
> 
> -Stephan

	combining ease, sophistication (do what i mean not what i say),
	and reliablilty is *hard*...it is rarely achieved.

	so we have ease and reliablilty but not effiecency.
jmb

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message