From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 21 3: 3: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7644137B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 03:02:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B426743E6E for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 03:02:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a238.otenet.gr [212.205.215.238]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gALB2bIx004468; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:02:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gALB2aqM010718; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:02:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gALB2ZNF010717; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:02:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:02:34 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: David Schultz Cc: Chris Pepper , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confirmation: ext2fs requires kernel rebuild? Message-ID: <20021121110234.GF8009@gothmog.gr> References: <20021119100625.GC679@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20021121035034.GA2591@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021121035034.GA2591@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2002-11-20 19:50, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Chris Pepper : > > I know they're distinct, but it's silly for a discussion of Linux > > applications to ignore the possibility of those apps residing on a > > Linux filesystem. I couldn't find ext2fs documented anywhere, > > which is the first issue. The second is adding a link & comment to > > the LABI chapter. > > Hmm...I think you're right. I don't see any documentation for the > option. I would just as soon hook the module up to the default > build like all the other modules, but maybe the license is an issue. The license *is* an issue. Distributing kernels that by default include GPL'ed code can have many complications for people who make commercial applications based on FreeBSD source. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message