Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Apr 2000 23:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        knu@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        ady@freebsd.ady.ro, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Removing FORBIDDEN tags on insecure ports
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004292355500.7846-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200004281114.EAA20398@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000 knu@FreeBSD.org wrote:

> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: knu
> State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 28 20:14:40 JST 2000
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Committed, thanks!

By the way, I think it would be better to wait for confirmation that the
new version has actually fixed the security problem before removing
FORBIDDEN tags on insecure ports (sometimes developers think they've fixed
a problem when in fact they haven't, or have created a new one).

This is just a note to the ports crowd for the future - I think imap-uw
can stay as is for now, though I've yet to check it.

Kris

----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004292355500.7846-100000>