From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 8 04:10:08 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B99340D9B for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wesley@freenetMail.de) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.freenet.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49gKXb3VV4z4NjJ for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wesley@freenetMail.de) Received: from [195.4.92.165] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1ji96o-0004M5-QX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:10:02 +0200 Received: from [::1] (port=36026 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1ji96o-0001Yl-Oo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:10:02 +0200 Received: from sub6.freenet.de ([195.4.92.125]:42122) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1ji943-00019e-F5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:07:11 +0200 Received: from [154.213.3.117] (port=46889 helo=[172.21.86.103]) by sub6.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID wesley@freenetMail.de) (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256) (port 587) (Exim 4.92 #3) id 1ji943-0007pH-6b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:07:11 +0200 Subject: Re: freebsd vs. netbsd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de> <20200608051434.ca70e5c5.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Wesley Message-ID: <0fee3973-287b-c2da-8443-92403aa90881@freenetMail.de> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:07:08 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200608051434.ca70e5c5.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originated-At: 154.213.3.117!46889 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49gKXb3VV4z4NjJ X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of wesley@freenetMail.de has no SPF policy when checking 2001:748:100:40::2:3) smtp.mailfrom=wesley@freenetMail.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.42 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freenetMail.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.63)[0.630]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.02)[-0.023]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.92)[0.916]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2001:748:100:40::2:3:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5430, ipnet:2001:748::/32, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 04:10:08 -0000 On 2020/6/8 上午 11:14, Polytropon wrote: >> what are their use scenes then? > Oversimplified: NetBSD is the candidate for "runs everywhere", > so it's very useful for embedded systems and "strange" hardware > platforms; OpenBSD has security as primary goal, that makes it > perfect for servers; FreeBSD is also used for embedded, servers, > and desktops. In an attempt to summarize, all the BSDs can be > used for almost everything - from embedded, to laptops, desktops, > servers, and "combined forms". In reality, you_will_ find BSDs > in all those places, and you will also find them in places where > you don't know there is a BSD running, for example in routers, > managed switches, NAS, WLAN APs, firewall and other networking > appliances. They are also used as development platforms for a > lot of other systems. Thank you so much Polytropon. Do these three have difference on package management? For example, Ubuntu use apt, Centos use yum for package management. Though their main purpose are similar, but usage is different. Regards.