Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 15:10:39 -0500 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: David Magda <dmagda+fstable@ee.ryerson.ca> Cc: "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net>, Marcus Reid <marcus@blazingdot.com>, Mike Hogsett <hogsett@csl.sri.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Message-ID: <200301042010.h04KAd4E016002@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 04 Jan 2003 13:07:39 EST." <20030104180739.GB607@number6.magda.ca> References: <200301030117.H031HZS41668@asarian-host.net> <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com> <200301030117.H031HZS41668@asarian-host.net> <3.0.5.32.20030104112023.012b8ee8@mail.sage-one.net> <20030104180739.GB607@number6.magda.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:20:23AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> > Seems like a lot of trouble just to maintain "bragging rights" about
> > uptime, only to have a "hobbled" system that is not really up to date.
> > That's not quite "up" IMHO.
> [...]
>
> For some people these things are important. I have no problem with
> shutting down my machine every night. (Of course it's because it's in
> my (small) bedroom, and I want to get some sleep. :> )
Here's a fix for the "problem" for those people. Are we done kicking this yet?
--- kern_clock.c Fri Oct 18 21:19:06 2002
+++ /tmp/kern_clock.c Sat Jan 4 15:05:53 2003
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
time_t time_second;
struct timeval boottime;
-SYSCTL_STRUCT(_kern, KERN_BOOTTIME, boottime, CTLFLAG_RD,
+SYSCTL_STRUCT(_kern, KERN_BOOTTIME, boottime, CTLFLAG_RW,
&boottime, timeval, "System boottime");
/*
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301042010.h04KAd4E016002>