From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 21 10:48:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2373C37B401 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-88.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7FF43E42 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3672066B5E; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:48:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Danny Braniss Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc Message-ID: <20021021174837.GA51579@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > comments? That code is a REALLY inefficient use of malloc(). You can always write bizarre code that exaggerates the differences between different algorithms (e.g. Linux malloc vs FreeBSD malloc). Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9tD31Wry0BWjoQKURAlO3AKCArSDTTR3BxW7KpCdKhM7gap6kQACgg7Qy BfV9uUIT3DGIct8ict1myAY= =eLOb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message