Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:42:22 -0700 From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs inode.h src/sys/sys conf.h src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c Message-ID: <3DFCDB1E.3000605@btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <200212151928.gBFJSS59013513@beastie.mckusick.com> References: <200212151928.gBFJSS59013513@beastie.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirk McKusick wrote: > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:04:20 -0500 > From: Jake Burkholder > To: Kirk McKusick > Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs inode.h src/sys/sys conf.h ... > > Apparently, On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:29:46PM -0800, > Kirk McKusick said words to the effect of; > > > As a followup to my previous message, here is my proposed (and > > even tested!) change to use an appropriately wide field. > > > > So is this going to be committed? I'm tired of the tinderbox > failing and would like to update my sparcs. I'm glad I had > an older perforce tree so I was able to get some work done > this weekend. > > Jake > > I was unsure as to whether I had to get release engineerings approval > to make the change. As I had approval for the previous change and as > Ian Dowse has signed off on it, I have just now committed the change. > Sorry for the delay. > > Kirk McKusick Kirk, Thanks a lot for doing this. Just FYI, re@ approval is not needed for this kind of thing in HEAD. Assuming that there are no other issues with this, do you feel it's ready for RELENG_5_0 yet? Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DFCDB1E.3000605>