From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 14 20:16:17 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346D61065670;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:16:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CE68FC12;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:16:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.netplex.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id
	pAEK2Buu031651; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net)
X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]);
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=8+nbuSsvnFpXi9BdMwqdZzXJEjW0Fjb8CG4WmAu_9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1111141459490.28029@sea.ntplx.net>
References: <201111140101.pAE11XEa067064@mail.karels.net>
	<201111140802.13355.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1111141745001.94325@fledge.watson.org>
	<20111114193434.GC2164@hoeg.nl>
	<CAJ-Vmo=8+nbuSsvnFpXi9BdMwqdZzXJEjW0Fjb8CG4WmAu_9rQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, mike@karels.net,
	Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, arch@freebsd.org,
	Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin'
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:16:17 -0000

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> I honestly think we have _much bigger_ things to try and fix before we
> worry about the layout of binaries in the directory hierarchy.
>
> Once we've sorted out things like virtualisation hooks for the
> installer and management, better package management and upgrade paths,
> module/kernel build sync, cross-compiled ports, non-root installation
> methods, etc, etc.. I think then we could look at this kind of thing.

+1

And also how to stop double posts to the same list
(freebsd-arch@ removed).

-- 
DE