Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:18:11 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <b3429dc4-06cc-3a9b-604a-5c513eb61b4c@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <20191009143048.zliwcrjx7ahe67a7@ivaldir.net> References: <20191007.151841.1094708479149685365.yasu@utahime.org> <8spu-p72a-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20191009101412.lwxyqcdaqtsvq2ym@ivaldir.net> <20191009143048.zliwcrjx7ahe67a7@ivaldir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2019-10-09 16:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hello. > Please speak up in reply to this email, if you are > building without ipv6, why are you doing so, what are the real benefit for it. I'm building without IPv6, just because it's one (currently useless) less thing to worry about (settings, security, etc...). > How bad it will impact you if we do remove that option? I'll end up building and running ports/packages on systems with IPv6 disabled in the kernel. If there's no problem with that, I think I won't be impacted at all. bye & Thanks av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b3429dc4-06cc-3a9b-604a-5c513eb61b4c>