Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:48:18 +0900 From: KATO Takenori <kato@migmatite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lockmgr panic Message-ID: <199710220048.JAA16017@gneiss.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Oct 1997 00:00:53 %2B0200" References: <19971022000053.ZR34581@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Unlike what Nate assumed, i'm using it on -current anyway. I've got > one panic again, but now think that's because of the uninitialized > variable bug. Is panic 'ufs_unlock: recursive lock prematurely released'? If the stack where 'isvplocked' is stored is not zero, VOP_UNLOCK unlocks vnode which is not locked. ---- KATO Takenori <kato@ganko.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Dept. Earth Planet. Sci., Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, 464-01, Japan PGP public key: finger kato@eclogite.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp ------------------- Powered by FreeBSD(98) -------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710220048.JAA16017>