From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Jul 22 13:32:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B669A6DC5; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ptrcrt.ch (ptrcrt.ch [37.252.124.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227F214C0; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from webmail.ptrcrt.ch (192.168.1.2 [192.168.1.2]); by mail.ptrcrt.ch (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ae5f692e; TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:32:39 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:32:38 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r392666 - head/audio/libgroove Organization: The FreeBSD Project In-Reply-To: <55AF9AAC.8000106@marino.st> References: <201507220652.t6M6qVFO094263@repo.freebsd.org> <20150722122313.GA50653@FreeBSD.org> <20150722122531.GB50653@FreeBSD.org> <55AF9AAC.8000106@marino.st> Message-ID: <9e0f61d80cec95a2ff54af98f1421878@gahr.ch> X-Sender: gahr@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:32:43 -0000 On 2015-07-22 15:29, John Marino wrote: > On 7/22/2015 2:44 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> On 2015-07-22 14:25, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> In clear contrast with the PHB, which states "If this line is present, >> future maintainers must >> not change or remove it except at the original author's request." >> >> It does *not* say "Future maintainers can change it if not explicitly >> asked not to.". >> >> Look, we do have rules so we don't have to argue about taste, style, >> what's more sensible to you, etc. >> >>> Sorry I forgot to ask: so any problem with expansion? >> >> Yes, I do. Please revert. >> > > So reverting it obviously goes against current practice. Is the > "problem" one of principle? In other words, are you torqued because > danfe touched the makefile, so you want him to revert it regardless of > the commit itself? From afar, this appears like you are trying to make > a point at the expense of the ports tree. I never meant to revert the whole commit, sorry for the wording. Does 'please get back the "Created by" line as it was before' sound ok? > > John -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@FreeBSD.org