From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 15 18:20:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFC2471; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:20:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <525D8691.1050500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:16:49 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Renato Botelho , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, des@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330387 - head/misc/compat8x References: <201310151139.r9FBdeLZ054477@svn.freebsd.org> <525D7FBB.3060108@FreeBSD.org> <525D84B6.6000306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <525D84B6.6000306@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:20:02 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-10-15 14:08:54 -0400, Renato Botelho wrote: > On 15-10-2013 14:47, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On 2013-10-15 07:39:40 -0400, Renato Botelho wrote: >>> Author: garga Date: Tue Oct 15 11:39:39 2013 New Revision: >>> 330387 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/330387 >> >>> Log: - Update to 8.4.201310 - Remove liblwres.so.50 (not >>> present on 8.4) - Remove libstdc++.so.6 to avoid conflict with >>> compat9x [1] >> >> A binary built on 8.x requires both compat8x and compat9x now on >> 10.x where libstdc++.so is not installed by default. Is it >> intentional? > > It's better to require 2 compat ports to be installed than conflict > both compat8x and compat9x, what would make it impossible to run a > 8.x binary AND a 9.x binary on the same system. Okay. Then, this change deserves an entry in UPDATING, IMHO. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXYaRAAoJEHyflib82/FG+eoH/RAS/qSrK/tH2ToX+3MhSf7c bkDJEznqQHRuNOJg4DXXKFr1roESUc9SwhcY0vwWeuz57wb7N7K4u5UlzUd78O10 2DRwZwc8sKh2y3bnbHp7idAwYiKI7lobHmj3jdAkG98X3nzxRrz+Uw+grrWkwudl F1VDIQYIxg/zlkuVivVcsrwhfnmqAj7D+czUZc2OqXvSl/sTR0JFCYB4v8yLc81t R6Px3YtquVB7WTQNb7SEQ5xgBVGgqwaSKXLnrCEaVEPmFnAE0gfjCzFE9+ZMtr+S A8+hVmtVyLonYw6g3HPFRWmODXvk7jgrJ6t7bzhMDi+Ieazne6537Q5au1AAN9s= =EzpW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----