From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 27 01:17:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198C516A400 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C033543D45 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3R1HWmE003466 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:17:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:17:31 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604262017.31810.jhorne@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: OT - drives in a RAID5 configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:17:34 -0000 i would like to ask my freebsd peers a hardware question: my FreeBSD 6.0 server has a 3ware 6800 8 channel IDE raid controller. configuration is 6 disks, 4 120GB disks (/opt) in RAID5, and 2 76GB disks in RAID1 (everything else). one of the 76GB drives has failed. i have a few options that i could persue, but one option i need some advice on. i have another 120GB disk here at my apt, but its not the same model as the other 4 120s that are currently in the server. they are otherwise identical, but the 4 have 8mb cache, and the one here has 2mb cache. if i eliminate the 76GB RAID1, and (break/rebuild) the RAID5 with the additional 2mb chace 120GB drive, what kind, if any, performance degrdation would i expect? in a hardware RAID5 configuration, does the cache on the drive play a major role? on a related note, is anyone using any 3ware controllers in FreeBSD, and is there a way to monitor status (healthly, failed) from within the OS? thanks all, jonathan