Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Oct 2000 22:19:48 -0500
From:      Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: making concurrant builds safe.
Message-ID:  <20001013221948.K95891@puck.firepipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <20001012191713.E272@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:17:13PM -0700
References:  <20001012191713.E272@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:17:13PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> It might make sense to use the lockf(1) utility to make sure that
> two ports that started to build at the same time and had the same
> dependancy don't attempt to build the same dependancy at the same
> time?  I think a simple lockf on the makefile would be enough to
> support that.

This idea!

I like!

Teehee.  ;-P

-- 
Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> - Physics Computer Network wench
The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics."
	-- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001013221948.K95891>