From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 13 23:50: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from shell.unixbox.com (shell.unixbox.com [207.211.45.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7316E37B4C5 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:50:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fengyue@localhost) by shell.unixbox.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eAE7oTY55816; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:50:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:50:29 -0800 (PST) From: FengYue X-Sender: fengyue@shell.unixbox.com To: Renaud Waldura Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPPoE w/ nat auto fragmentation hack? In-Reply-To: <000001c04e05$269b7860$0402010a@biohz.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Renaud Waldura wrote: ->I wrote an article about this setup. Should be published soon enough. ->http://renaud.waldura.com/doc/freebsd-pppoe/ -> ->I'd like to get your feedback on the section making use of tcpmssd: it ->doesn't seem to work when the link is brought up automatically by ppp. -> ->--Renaud -> Thanks Renaud, great article and very helpful. I've not got a chance to test out the PPPoE with tcpmssd yet as the machine is not local to me. (I could ssh to it but have no access to the machines behind the nat to generate some testing packets) The only thing is that tcpmssd from FreeBSD port does not have -l option. The -l option, however, is being used in your tcpmssd.rc script. My port tree is quiet new so I guess there is some difference between the tcpmssd you offered on your site and the freebsd port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message