Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 07:27:08 +0100 From: Thomas Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Message-ID: <20030103062708.GA426@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.51.0301021738490.19685@xmission.xmission.com> References: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com> <Pine.GSO.4.51.0301021738490.19685@xmission.xmission.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* J. Scott Edwards (sedwards@xmission.com):
> That is impressive. I'm curious if they stayed at a particular version or
> if they update as new versions are available? I thought I read somewhere
> that FreeBSD could load a new kernel without rebooting?
You do not want your favourite OS to support that.
Why go people that nuts about uptimes anyway? When I have to reboot to
load a new kernel because of security fixes, so what?
--Thomas
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030103062708.GA426>