From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 00:46:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910BB141 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CF18FC14 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 00:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b5so2241231lbd.13 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:46:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nL3llYO+xLKfddmePrIkViXUiBjZmGzhsaZgw6mTh+U=; b=dmijct6J0amEn90w8IpymZVwbiTEmfC2Us1PRN49Scb1V+TfofzKdXN13+L51q5pBx NFkXhawvTZnEMlMRwUAAUk+RgK1j9EX9NsYALdjSc1I5GL6lKjN0RrPSDQK6NeDAz6k7 s5yt2RJObTSwukxCkXFQ4O5uqN41mT65+5chE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=nL3llYO+xLKfddmePrIkViXUiBjZmGzhsaZgw6mTh+U=; b=Z8/Dw5Uqh02jNWGrBG/A2WxbSCFhq9fwfFiRDYUcaJmpqxjcriM97jNnfN+mBJWu2R ACKDh/XVgwa8gf9f+lRc+39wdOEORMMI5SvT3nNqnvICCYtIDgMDuyKj2YJHz2BYTFwl zuRxKQiO5GFRnfOoQNIw64GjS/vQ0W5ZlmP62SDOct5uH1yrnN0ToJcsx3a7P5q/JFgM k8rehqHSGLTxMgtNCRS4OElS6bFTScGJWvpS8yVZnYdmtLg5tFD4+ImiJbKDZMX3CMKd wQiD2+NcFYvZIWP7IInf0Cp379jwjY8to6b1TnMGJ6Jy9oP7zDPQfJuxyuR6PG644uVa QLWw== Received: by 10.112.100.102 with SMTP id ex6mr2636009lbb.130.1352335571875; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:46:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.25.166 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:45:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown> References: <20121107221730.000017c1@unknown> From: Eitan Adler Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 19:45:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: removing support for ICC?? To: Alexander Leidinger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQB7D73kLCGyOfCa6qbJ8nc+EuwlkW4RtBPDS0+STaD6CFmR3JhZuIQ3HwPD4RoETHgJ1W Cc: bde@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:46:13 -0000 On 7 November 2012 16:17, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:58:45 -0500 Eitan Adler > wrote: > >> Is there any reason to continue to keep the legacy __INTEL_COMPILER >> conditional includes around? > > Is there a reason to remove them from cdefs.h? There aren't a lot of > them, they don't obfuscate things, they are not in the way of improving > things, they don't make the existing stuff harder to read. ... > cdefs.h is not only used in the kernel, but also in the userland. > Anything from userland which includes cdefs.h and may also compile on > other operating systems benefits from keeping this support in cdefs.h. I just noticed this ancient stuff in src and decided to clean it up. Since it is clearly needed, I'll drop it. -- Eitan Adler