Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:33:03 CDT
From:      "Konan Houphoue" <bahobab@hotmail.com>
To:        cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc:        ari@suutari.iki.fi, marcs@draenor.org, archie@whistle.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, virtual_olympus@yahoo.com
Subject:   Re: Port 80 redirect: Good news!!
Message-ID:  <F37SpwBGpEI2rV4ZneA00000f38@hotmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'll check my configuration and get back to you on this tonight.

KOnan


----Original Message Follows----
From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
To: Konan Houphoue <bahobab@hotmail.com>
CC: ari@suutari.iki.fi, marcs@draenor.org, archie@whistle.com,   
freebsd-net@freebsd.org, virtual_olympus@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Port 80 redirect: Good news!!
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:30:18 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [64.6.192.82] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
MHotMailBB9390DB00B0D82197A04006C0520BF90; Thu Sep 21 10:31:12 2000
Received: from 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com ([64.6.211.149]) by 
mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Thu, 21 
Sep 2000 10:29:11 -0700
Received: (from cjc@localhost)by 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) 
id e8LHUIM30796;Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:30:18 -0700 (PDT)(envelope-from cjc)
From cjc@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com Thu Sep 21 10:35:11 2000
Message-ID: <20000921103018.B30474@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>
References: <F3o3DjFbUcOV1EetVoM00000b3d@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <F3o3DjFbUcOV1EetVoM00000b3d@hotmail.com>; from 
bahobab@hotmail.com on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:26:28AM -0500
Return-Path: cjc@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com

On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:26:28AM -0500, Konan Houphoue wrote:
 > #If you're using 'options BRIDGE', uncomment the following line to pass 
ARP
 > ${fwcmd} add 300 pass udp from 0.0.0.0 2054 to 0.0.0.0
 >
 > I believe it is uncommented to keep the 2 interfaces on different network
 > but yet allowing local traffic on this computer.

You are doing routing and NAT on this gateway, AND it is a bridge?!
That's not a great idea. Did you really put,

   options	BRIDGE

In the kernel and flip the sysctl switches to turn bridging on?
--
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F37SpwBGpEI2rV4ZneA00000f38>