From owner-freebsd-audit Thu Jun 21 4:19:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9FD37B40A; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5LBJlM14348; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EE13808; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:19:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: John Baldwin Cc: Terry Lambert , audit@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: new kldpath(8): display/modify the module search path In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 04:19:47 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20010621111947.D8EE13808@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Baldwin wrote: > > On 19-Jun-01 Terry Lambert wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: > >> To me, it seems more sensible to use the same interface that > >> ldconfig uses. > > > > Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! > > Terry, I mean interface in terms of having the command switches be the same. > I.e., dont' have -r do a rescan for one but remove a path for the other. FWIW, the 'module name' to 'kld file' mapping work-in-progress would make good use of a kldconfig/kldpath/whatever interface. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message