From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 14:00:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB3616A4D0 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:00:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E29843D49 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j19E0gNc087962 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:00:42 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j19E0g4l087961; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:00:42 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:00:42 GMT Message-Id: <200502091400.j19E0g4l087961@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pawel Worach Subject: Re: ports/68826: various anomalies with xemacs port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pawel Worach List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:00:42 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/68826; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pawel Worach To: Matthias Buelow Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/68826: various anomalies with xemacs port Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:56:57 +0100 Matthias Buelow wrote: > Another thing: could the dependency on the xemacs-packages port be > removed? Xemacs really has its own packages system, and the > xemacs-packages port is a rather arbitrary (and, as I found out, > sometimes outdated) assortment. What would be cool would be: a) plain > xemacs port, which doesn't install any packages, and b) xemacs "sumo" > packages port, which installs the sumo (i.e. all) package tarball. > Anything in between doesn't really make sense, since what packages to > include, and what not depends on the personal preferences of the port > maintainer. Most of this has now been taken care of with ports/77291, you can set WITHOUT_MOTIF to get a pure Athena build and optionally WITH_XAW3D to use Xaw3d. Here is a patch to make the packages optional with WITHOUT_XEMACS_PACKAGES --- Makefile.orig Wed Feb 9 14:50:31 2005 +++ Makefile Wed Feb 9 14:52:17 2005 @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@ XEMACS_VER= 21.4.17 XEMACS_ARCH= ${CONFIGURE_TARGET} -RUN_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/etc/enriched.doc:${PORTSDIR}/editors/xemacs-packages - USE_BZIP2= yes STRIP= USE_AUTOCONF_VER=213 @@ -50,6 +48,9 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-system-malloc --pdump .endif +.if !defined(WITHOUT_XEMACS_PACKAGES) +RUN_DEPENDS+= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/xemacs/xemacs-packages/etc/enriched.doc:${PORTSDIR}/editors/xemacs-packages +.endif .if !defined(WITHOUT_X11) LIB_DEPENDS+= png.5:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/png \ jpeg.9:${PORTSDIR}/graphics/jpeg \ Also would anyone mind if I removed the dependency on faces? It pulls in gtk 1.x and a lot of other crap not everyone wants. -- Pawel