From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 17 13:11:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBC61520D for ; Mon, 17 May 1999 13:11:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Thrumbar@Worldnet.att.net) Received: from 188.neworleans-15-20rs16rt.la.dial-access.att.net ([12.73.251.188]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with SMTP id <19990517201119.GMYC10864@188.neworleans-15-20rs16rt.la.dial-access.att.net> for ; Mon, 17 May 1999 20:11:19 +0000 From: Thrumbar@Worldnet.att.net (Thrumbar Pathfinder) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Berkeley DB 1.85 --> 2.0 Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 20:09:06 GMT Organization: OmniCorp Interstellar Message-ID: <3746628e.2366261@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> References: <19990513164720.A26399@trinsec.com> <199905132050.QAA10438@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199905132050.QAA10438@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Could you be more specific on what part of the license is so unfriendly????? Thrumbar@Worldnet.att.net On Thu, 13 May 1999 16:50:17 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: >< = said: > >> Out of curiosity, is there a reason we are still using Berkeley DB = v1.85 as >> apposed to v2? =20 > >Yes. v2 has an unfriendly license. > >-GAWollman > >-- >Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all = the same >wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom=20 >Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame >MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad = Irschick > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message