From owner-freebsd-questions Sun May 7 01:12:18 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA09599 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 7 May 1995 01:12:18 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA09592 for ; Sun, 7 May 1995 01:12:08 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA05653; Sun, 7 May 1995 16:06:46 +0800 Date: Sun, 7 May 1995 16:06:45 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: David Greenman cc: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS-L Subject: Re: Heavy HTTPD serving on 2.0-950412 In-Reply-To: <199505060440.VAA00157@corbin.Root.COM> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 5 May 1995, David Greenman wrote: > > 1024 probably isn't enough, then. I'd recommend increasing it to 1500. Note > that this will consume 6MB of memory. Yow, I'll keep that in mind. When I run a netstat -m, I get: 112 mbufs in use: 2 mbufs allocated to data 20 mbufs allocated to packet headers 79 mbufs allocated to protocol control blocks 11 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses 1/644 mbuf clusters in use 1302 Kbytes allocated to network (1% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines i.e., 644 clusters were in use at any one time during the test (I haven't rebooted since then). Is one mbuf needed per network connection, in general? Netstat showed around 500 open tcp connections during the test (most in TIME_WAIT, mind you). -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org