From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 26 15:32:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCF737B401 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 15:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [193.197.184.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA97E43F3F for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 15:32:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with gbsmtp id 19KQVr-0007Ws-00; Tue, 27 May 2003 00:32:15 +0200 Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4QLtdrH012893 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 23:55:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mailnull@localhost.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4QLtdR4012892 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 May 2003 23:55:39 +0200 (CEST) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 21:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <3ED152AF.1000404@i4free.co.nz> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: License issues (e.g. mod_throttle, mod_watch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 22:32:18 -0000 Andrew Turner wrote: > Would adding LICENSE= to port Makefiles help? Speaking from OpenBSD experience, no. They originally tried this, but when you look at thousands of ports, you will find numerous cases of homegrown licenses that cannot be neatly summerized in one line. OpenBSD introduced variables PERMIT_{DISTFILES,PACKAGE}_{CDROM,FTP}, that are roughly equivalent to (if a bit more fine-grained than) our NO_PACKAGE/NO_CDROM/RESTRICTED. Porters need to scrutinize the included licenses and set the respective variables. One particularly annoying case that is probably as common as explicitly restrictive licensing is the complete lack of any license. Alas, this means that basic copyright law forbids any redistribution, use, etc, even if this was not in the author's intent. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de