From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 23:33:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B71CF5 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1DF141 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [78.194.61.125]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDE294001E; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:32:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54E52129.5020404@bebik.net> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:32:57 +0100 From: Rodrigo OSORIO User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lumiwa@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash does not work: firefox-35.0.1_1,1, nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4 References: <201502181313.t1IDDuJu086783@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> <20150218161113.GA99702@shell.bebik.local> <31720446.6QK2ZuxZ1S@lumiwa.farms.net> In-Reply-To: <31720446.6QK2ZuxZ1S@lumiwa.farms.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anton Shterenlikht X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:33:01 -0000 On 02/18/15 18:05, ajtiM wrote: > On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 04:11:13 PM Rodrigo Osorio wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What 'sysctl compat.linux.osrelease' says ? >> Try 'sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.16.18' >> and restart firefox. >> >> If it works, put compat.linux.osrelease=2.16.18 >> in your /etc/sysctl.conf. >> >> Cheers, >> - rodrigo >> > > 2.16.16 or is correct 2.6.18? > > In fact I have 2.6.20 in my computer, sorry for the mistake