From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:10:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0898216A518 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:10:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D9C43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:10:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j07GAYNo063565 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:10:34 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j07GAYNM063564; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:10:34 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:10:34 GMT Message-Id: <200501071610.j07GAYNM063564@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kirk Strauser Subject: Re: ports/75824: [patch] rc.d/jabberd.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kirk Strauser List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:10:35 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/75824; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kirk Strauser To: "Volker Stolz" Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, oss-freebsd-ports@technorama.net Subject: Re: ports/75824: [patch] rc.d/jabberd.sh Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:08:29 -0600 --nextPart2590941.RWzk3jVndt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 07 January 2005 06:04, Volker Stolz wrote: > Dear maintainer, please review the proposed patch! There are a couple of problems with the patch (and my interaction with it): 1) The PR was submitted against net/jabberd (of which I am the maintainer),= =20 the the patch is actually against net/jabber (of which I am not). 2) Would this be an appropriate time to switch that file to use rc.subr,=20 rather than continuing to patch the old version? It otherwise looks as though it would work as expected. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2590941.RWzk3jVndt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBB3rQB5sRg+Y0CpvERAo7mAKCFZtnY5z3xR6gtpbujUAvWwcnQoACbBsgY JdIWH0Smt4XYogpK7hp+X0k= =3lnY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2590941.RWzk3jVndt--