From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 22:20:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F57F106564A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 22:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [204.89.241.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5598FC1A for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 22:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net [10.70.1.253]) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11D7621C51 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 18:20:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (usbctdc001.secnap.com [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF8F621C21 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 18:20:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FCBE328.3030702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 18:20:24 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <20120603192023.GA8350@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20120603200101.GB98939@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120603215406.GC98939@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120603215406.GC98939@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: optionsng ignores /var/db/ports//options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:20:23 -0000 On 6/3/12 5:54 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > The real fix which will be long term, any volunteer? would be to define a > PKGNAMEEXTRAPREFIX in bsd.port.mk that bsd.*.mk can overwrite and create a > UNIQUENAME that is independant from that EXTRAPREFIX. > or back all this out until its actually tested instead of breaking a percentage of the 26,000 ports out there? Yes, we need this, but lets stop breaking things. php54 broke things (still not fixed, pr's still in GNATS for this) png update broke things (still not fixed, pr's still in GNATS. and its not even Monday in most of the world yet) optionsng should have been 100% upward compatible. you should not be forced to an an emergency update of a port you maintain just because the ports tree broke things. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell