From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 21:32:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169E106564A for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8E58FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6MLWWer004618; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:32:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q6MLWWCh004615; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:32:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:32:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jakub Lach In-Reply-To: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-ID: References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:32:37 -0000 > which actually works with FreeBSD just ripped from > package! (normal _empty_ FAT filesystem, no > garbageware added, no need to format). zero difference. newfs_msdos take a moment. > It actually bounces from 40MB/s limit when reading > from it. > > Writing is about 18MB/s. > > Device is supposed to be "467x" which should > be about 70MB/s. don't treat all advertised data seriously > > And USB 2.0 hard limit is 60MB/s. > > Wouldn't be nice to squeeze few additional > MB/s? how did you measured it. dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=64k ? dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=64k via msdosfs via mtools ?