From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 12 19:34:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from va.cs.wm.edu (va.cs.wm.edu [128.239.2.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB4637B400 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:34:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from dali.cs.wm.edu (dali [128.239.26.26]) by va.cs.wm.edu (8.11.4/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g0D3Y2u09070 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:34:02 -0500 (EST) Received: (from zvezdan@localhost) by dali.cs.wm.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g0D3YPR00925 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:34:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:34:25 -0500 From: Zvezdan Petkovic To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Portupgrade Utility Message-ID: <20020112223425.A901@dali.cs.wm.edu> Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3C38AFF2.5020708@unios.dhs.org> <20020106213531.GE19117@gw.tex.bogus> <3C4083F4.9000900@unios.dhs.org> <20020112151622.H40697@hal9000.halplant.com> <000701c19ba7$c1c01800$0300a8c0@max> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <000701c19ba7$c1c01800$0300a8c0@max>; from willythemax@yahoo.it on Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 09:28:00PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 09:28:00PM +0100, Massimiliano Stucchi wrote: > Anyway, if not portupgrade, why not include cvsup in the base system, as I > think we're talking about a really necessary utility ? > Allow me to disagree. CVS is absolutely necessary. CVSup is not. It's merely a convenience. One can do source and port updates using cvs only. -- Zvezdan Petkovic http://www.cs.wm.edu/~zvezdan/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message