Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:58:24 +0400 From: "Alexey V. Panfilov" <lehis2000@mail.ru> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPI-B as router Message-ID: <514C8DB0.4080907@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <794F748F-F444-43C5-88DD-E821251844A4@freebsd.org> References: <514B2188.8030905@mail.ru> <794F748F-F444-43C5-88DD-E821251844A4@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
22.03.2013 09:09, Tim Kientzle wrote: > On Mar 21, 2013, at 8:04 AM, Alexey V. Panfilov wrote: >> >> I decide to test RRI-B as simple router (without NAT): [Host A] --- >> [RPI-B] --- [Host B] >> ... >> So RPI-B network's throughput was around 20Mbit/sec of full-duplex traffic: > > Have you tried it with Linux? If Linux is about the same > speed, then it's probably a hardware limitation. No, I haven't tried it with Linux yet. > >> gpu_mem=8Mb >> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r248554 >> Kernel's config (original RPI-B) was modified by commented out >> >> #makeoptions MODULES_OVERRIDE="" > > Did you remove WITNESS and INVARIANTS ? > > They make a huge difference to overall system performance. > Yes, I've test it with removed INVARIANTS - result was the same. WITNESS is not present at /sys/arm/conf/RPI-B >> Ipfw has one rule - allow ip from any to any > > Did it make a difference if you disabled ipfw? No, I've not test it with disabled ipfw . > Tim > -- Best regards, Alexey V. Panfilov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?514C8DB0.4080907>