Date: 09 Feb 2006 09:04:05 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: ianchov@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail back-up system Message-ID: <44irrozl0q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <200602090910.k199AKB6011124@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <200602090700.k1970DiJ095554@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <18e02bd30602090026h2e297677sc6742cbb653aede5@mail.gmail.com> <200602090910.k199AKB6011124@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> writes: > > I read the article and the idea is good. But i would like to know what MTA > > are you using..In the paper you said that at first the email is strored in > > Mailbox format. Isn`t that a bottleneck. WHat are the loads of the machines= > > Considering we have only 200 users and 3000 messages per day, whatever > would do. > > MTA is sendmail/milter. > > I plan to change that mailbox thing when I get budget for a new > machine to play with (I don't want to take the risk to break the > working configuration). Mailbox format might not be a bottleneck in this application. It's fairly efficient at appending new messages, and that is the only common operation being performed on these backup mail spools.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44irrozl0q.fsf>