Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 19:52:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Stephen Hurd <shurd@sasktel.net> Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406031943310.91671@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <538E2AC9.7010309@sasktel.net> References: <92E4FB10-DDC8-4B3E-9242-4E8494491630@FreeBSD.org> <538DBAEC.5060905@gmail.com> <538E2924.3090002@gmx.de> <538E2AC9.7010309@sasktel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Hurd wrote: > I would venture that docs bugs and certain classes of website bugs rarely > have communications. For example: ... There are trivial bugs in any class, but it's a mistake to think that most of any particular class are that way. I do agree that some trivial bugs will be lost due to the submitter not wanting to create Yet Another Account(TM). Still, it acts as a test of the submitter's determination and indirectly, the quality of the information they give.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1406031943310.91671>