From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 05:53:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF9D37B401; Thu, 8 May 2003 05:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B843F75; Thu, 8 May 2003 05:53:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h48CrrSQ064667; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:53:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h48Crr38064666; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:53:53 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h48Csx8c009344; Thu, 8 May 2003 13:54:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200305081254.h48Csx8c009344@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas Seck) In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 May 2003 12:36:55 -0000." <20030508123655.514.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 13:54:59 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 12:53:55 -0000 Thomas Seck writes: > To follow up on myself: > > > * Kris Kennaway (kris@obsecurity.org): > > >> With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable > >> from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh. That's part > >> of what we're discussing. > > Sysinstall (built via 'make release' from May 7, 12:00 GMT sources) > still offered a "krb5" distribution when selecting "custom packages", > although selecting "crypto" seems to do what has been announced here. Is > this intentional or just an oversight? I just haven't got there yet.. :-) M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH